Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39408344›Full record

ArticleNutrients2024

Nutritional Education in Polish Companies: Employee Needs and the Role of Employers in Health Promotion.

Anna Katarzyna Mazurek-Kusiak, Andrzej Soroka, Agnieszka Godlewska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anna Katarzyna Mazurek-KusiakDepartment Tourism and Recreation, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 15 Akademicka Street, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3786-8861
Andrzej SorokaFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Siedlce, Stanisława Konarskiego 2, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland.
Agnieszka GodlewskaFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Siedlce, Stanisława Konarskiego 2, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The modern work environment is constantly evolving, and with it, the emphasis on employee health and well-being is increasing.

backgroundNutritional education has become a key component of health promotion strategies in many companies that recognize the benefits of healthy eating habits for enhancing efficiency and job satisfaction.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to understand employees' nutritional needs at work, and to assess the support provided by employers. The analysis focused on employees' eating habits and their attitudes towards eating at work, motives and barriers to healthy eating.

methodsThe study was conducted using an anonymous survey completed by 1.056 individuals from across Poland. A discriminant function was selected for data analysis, which examined the differences between groups. RESULTS/

conclusionsThe larger enterprises are more inclined to establish meal consumption spaces, which contributes to a more organised work culture. The larger the business, the more time employees spend eating meals, it being influenced by better-developed eating facilities, which undoubtedly encourages the workers to take longer breaks. The people with obesity were found to place the highest value on healthy food options and the people with a normal BMI are more responsive to healthy food subsidies, nutritional advice provided by a dietitian, and access to fitness facilities.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorHealth PromotionWorkplaceAdultDiet, HealthyFemaleHealth EducationHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational HealthPolandSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultbarriers and motivescompany canteensemployeeemployerhealthy eating

Identifiers

PMID39408344
PMCPMC11478399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.