ArticleNutrients2024
Severity Ranking of Missense and Frameshift Genetic Variants in SCD1 by In Silico and In Vitro Functional Analysis.
Article in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA considerable proportion of the symptoms associated with excessive dietary intake can be attributed to systemic imbalances in lipid metabolism. The prominent toxicity of saturated fatty acids has been repeatedly demonstrated and sheds light on the protective role of stearoyl-CoA desaturase-1 (SCD1), the key enzyme for fatty acid desaturation. SCD1 protein expression is regulated at the levels of transcription, translation, and degradation. However, the modulating effect of the variability of the human genome must also be taken into account. Therefore, we aimed to ascertain whether natural missense or frameshift mutations in SCD1 (p.H125P, p.M224L, p.A333T, p.R253AfsTer7) could influence the expression, degradation, or function of the enzyme.
methodsIn silico and in vitro experiments were conducted to comprehensively evaluate the consequences associated with each genetic variation, with the objective of using the results to propose a risk or severity ranking of SCD1 variants.
resultsAs anticipated, the p.R253AfsTer7 variant was identified as the most deleterious in structural, functional, and quantitative terms. The p.H125P variant also reduced the desaturation capacity of the enzyme in accordance with the predicted structural alterations and augmented degradation resulting from folding complications. This was aggravated by increased mRNA instability and accompanied by mild endoplasmic reticulum stress induction. The p.A333T protein exhibited an intermediate phenotype, whereas p.M224L showed no deleterious effects and even increased the amount of SCD1.
conclusionsIn conclusion, the large-scale identification of genetic variations needs to be supplemented with comprehensive functional characterization of these variations to facilitate adequate personalized prevention and treatment of lipid metabolism-related conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.