Article in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Thainá Richelli Oliveira ResendeBody Image and Eating Disorders Research Group (NICTA), Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Governador Valadares 35010-180, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4896-5605
Edilene Márcia de SousaBody Image and Eating Disorders Research Group (NICTA), Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Governador Valadares 35010-180, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0009-3820-1303
Marle Dos Santos AlvarengaDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-904, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6922-2670
Mariana Cristina Palermo FerreiraBody Image and Eating Disorders Research Group (NICTA), Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Governador Valadares 35010-180, MG, Brazil.
Larissa Stefhanne Damasceno de Amorim PóvoaPostgraduate Program in Applied Health Sciences (PPgCAS), Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Governador Valadares 35010-180, MG, Brazil.
Leandro Henrique Pereira GalvanePostgraduate Program in Applied Health Sciences (PPgCAS), Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Governador Valadares 35010-180, MG, Brazil.
Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo LemosDepartment of Dentistry, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Governador Valadares 35010-180, MG, Brazil.
António RaposoCBIOS (Research Center for Biosciences and Health Technologies), Universidade Lusófona de Humanidades e Tecnologias, Campo Grande 376, 1749-024 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5286-2249
Ariana SaraivaDepartment of Animal Pathology and Production, Bromatology and Food Technology, Faculty of Veterinary, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Trasmontaña s/n, 35413 Arucas, Spain.
Conrado CarrascosaDepartment of Animal Pathology and Production, Bromatology and Food Technology, Faculty of Veterinary, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Trasmontaña s/n, 35413 Arucas, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2802-7873
Hmidan A AlturkiKing Abdulaziz City for Science & Technology, Wellness and Preventive Medicine Institute-Health Sector, Riyadh 11442, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-4359-063X
Pedro Henrique Berbert de CarvalhoBody Image and Eating Disorders Research Group (NICTA), Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Governador Valadares 35010-180, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4918-5080
Funding
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior CAPES; Finance Code 001
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
The Preference for Intuition and Deliberation in Food Decision-Making Scale (E-PID) was developed to evaluate both intuitive and deliberative food decision-making within a single instrument. However, its psychometric properties have only been assessed among German-speaking participants. The main aim of the present study was to evaluate evidence of validity and reliability of the E-PID among 604 Brazilian adult women. Exploratory (
Indexed as
Decision MakingFeeding BehaviorFood PreferencesIntuitionPsychometricsAdolescentAdultBrazilEatingFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultcross-cultural adaptationdecision-makingfeeding behaviorsintuitive eatingmeasurementpsychometricsreliabilityvalidity
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Psychometric Properties of the Preference for Intuition and Deliberation in Eating Decision-Making Scale among Brazilian Adult Women. · full record | OpenQuestion