ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Interprofessional In Situ Simulation's Impact on Healthcare Personnel's Competence and Reported Need for Training in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation-A Pilot Study in Norway.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesInternational guidelines recommend cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR] training every sixth month. However, research indicates that more training is needed to maintain CPR competence. The objectives of this pilot study were (a) to assess health personnel's self-reported competence and need for more training in CPR before and after interprofessional in situ CPR simulation and (b) to assess time since the last CPR course and respondent's reported need for more training. Also, we wanted a pilot to assess areas of improvement in a future, larger study.
methodsA questionnaire was administered to healthcare personnel in hospital wards receiving CPR training using a purposeful sampling strategy.
resultsIn total, 311 respondents answered the pre-intervention and 45 respondents answered the post-intervention survey. The respondents believed they had good knowledge, skills, and training in CPR, and about 2/3 of the respondents reported a need for more knowledge, skills, and training. There was a weak positive correlation between the time since the last CPR course and the perceived need for more training [
conclusionsThe authors suggest that regular training is important for maintaining competence in CPR. Also, in a future study, comparisons at an individual level, as well as assessments by experts and of non-technical skills, should be included.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.