Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39408177›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Advancing Patient Safety: The Future of Artificial Intelligence in Mitigating Healthcare-Associated Infections: A Systematic Review.

Davide Radaelli, Stefano Di Maria, Zlatko Jakovski, Djordje Alempijevic, Ibrahim Al-Habash, Monica Concato, Matteo Bolcato, Stefano D'Errico

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Davide RadaelliDepartment of Medical Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7053-6463
Stefano Di MariaDepartment of Medical Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy.
Zlatko JakovskiInstitute of Forensic Medicine, Criminalistic and Medical Deontology, University Ss. Cyril and Methodius, 1000 Skopje, North Macedonia.ORCID 0000-0002-2669-8828
Djordje AlempijevicInstitute of Forensic Medicine 'Milovan Milovanovic', School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-0810-9559
Ibrahim Al-HabashForensic Medicine Department, Mutah University, Karak 61710, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0002-3548-4100
Monica ConcatoDepartment of Medical Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1026-3106
Matteo BolcatoDepartment of Medicine, Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences, 00131 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8784-8463
Stefano D'ErricoDepartment of Medical Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare-associated infections are infections that patients acquire during hospitalization or while receiving healthcare in other facilities. They represent the most frequent negative outcome in healthcare, can be entirely prevented, and pose a burden in terms of financial and human costs. With the development of new AI and ML algorithms, hospitals could develop new and automated surveillance and prevention models for HAIs, leading to improved patient safety. The aim of this review is to systematically retrieve, collect, and summarize all available information on the application and impact of AI in HAI surveillance and/or prevention.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review of the literature using PubMed and Scopus to find articles related to the implementation of artificial intelligence in the surveillance and/or prevention of HAIs.

resultsWe identified a total of 218 articles, of which only 35 were included in the review. Most studies were conducted in the US (n = 10, 28.6%) and China (n = 5; 14.3%) and were published between 2021 and 2023 (26 articles, 74.3%) with an increasing trend over time. Most focused on the development of ML algorithms for the identification/prevention of surgical site infections (n = 18; 51%), followed by HAIs in general (n = 9; 26%), hospital-acquired urinary tract infections (n = 5; 9%), and healthcare-associated pneumonia (n = 3; 9%). Only one study focused on the proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) and included healthcare workers as the study population. Overall, the trend indicates that several AI/ML models can effectively assist clinicians in everyday decisions, by identifying HAIs early or preventing them through personalized risk factors with good performance. However, only a few studies have reported an actual implementation of these models, which proved highly successful. In one case, manual workload was reduced by nearly 85%, while another study observed a decrease in the local hospital's HAI incidence from 1.31% to 0.58%.

conclusionsAI has significant potential to improve the prevention, diagnosis, and management of healthcare-associated infections, offering benefits such as increased accuracy, reduced workloads, and cost savings. Although some AI applications have already been tested and validated, adoption in healthcare is hindered by barriers such as high implementation costs, technological limitations, and resistance from healthcare workers. Overcoming these challenges could allow AI to be more widely and cost-effectively integrated, ultimately improving patient care and infection management.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencehealthcare-associated infectionsinfection preventionmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID39408177
PMCPMC11477207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.