ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024
Treatment-Related Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: a medical challenge in the peripartum period requiring a multimodal approach: a case report.AJOG global reports · 2026Article
- Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome as a rare postoperative complication after resection of a rosette-forming glioneuronal tumor: a case report and literature review.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Delayed ischemic stroke ten days after aluminum phosphide ingestion in a previously healthy 21-year-old Ethiopian woman: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2026Article
- Case report and literature review: neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus presenting as massive intracerebral hemorrhage.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome with concomitant recurrent subarachnoid hemorrhage and coronary vasospastic angina: A manifestation of systemic vasoconstriction syndrome.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is a rare but significant cause of intracranial arteriopathy and stroke in young adults. The syndrome encompasses a spectrum of disorders radiologically characterized by reversible narrowing and dilation of intracranial arteries, often triggered by vasoactive drugs or the postpartum period. The hallmark clinical feature of RCVS is thunderclap headache with or without other neurological signs. Though endothelial dysfunction and sympathetic hyperactivation are hypothesized to be key mechanisms, the exact pathogenesis of RCVS is still unclear. RCVS's diagnosis could be challenging, since vasospasm proceeds centripetally, initially involving distal small pial and cortical arteries, and angiographic studies, especially brain magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and computed tomography angiography (CTA), may miss it in the early phase of the disease, while early signs such as vascular hyperintensities may be visible on T2/FLAIR sequences before vasospasm onset. Catheter angiography is the gold standard and it could be used to assess vasospasm reversibility post-intra-arterial vasodilator administration. Treatment is mainly symptomatic, and nimodipine is the most commonly administered therapy, given orally or intra-arterially in severe cases. Since many aspects of RCVS remain partially known, further research is needed to better understand the complex pathophysiology of this unique clinical condition and to optimize specific management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.