Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39407969›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Assessing the Impact of ChatGPT in Dermatology: A Comprehensive Rapid Review.

Polat Goktas, Andrzej Grzybowski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Assessing public interest in artificial intelligence in dermatology: A Google Trends analysis.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Implementing GPT-4 Learning Models in Dermatology: An Assessment of Medical Quality and Utility.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. The Role of ChatGPT in Dermatology Diagnostics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Polat GoktasUCD School of Computer Science, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-7183-6890
Andrzej GrzybowskiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Warmia and Mazury, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3724-2391

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceChatGPTdermatologyethicslarge language modelmedical writingnatural language processingpatient educationteledermatology

Identifiers

PMID39407969
PMCPMC11477344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.