ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2024
In Situ Raman Spectroscopy as a Valuable Tool for Monitoring Crystallization Kinetics in Molecular Glasses.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Calorimetric Monitoring of the Sub-TMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The performance of in situ Raman microscopy (IRM) in monitoring the crystallization kinetics of amorphous drugs (griseofulvin and indomethacin) was evaluated using a comparison with the data obtained via differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). IRM was found to accurately and sensitively detect the initial stages of the crystal growth processes, including the rapid glass-crystal surface growth or recrystallization between polymorphic phases, with the reliable localized identification of the particular polymorphs being the main advantage of IRM over DSC. However, from the quantitative point of view, the reproducibility of the IRM measurements was found to be potentially significantly hindered due to inaccurate temperature recording and calibration, variability in the Raman spectra corresponding to the fully amorphous and crystalline phases, and an overly limited number of spectra possible to collect during acceptable experimental timescales because of the applied heating rates. Since theoretical simulations showed that, from the kinetics point of view, the constant density of collected data points per kinetic effect results in the smallest distortions, only the employment of the fast Raman mapping functions could advance the performance of IRM above that of calorimetric measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.