Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39407689›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Comparison of Construction Strategies of Solid Electrolyte Interface (SEI) in Li Battery and Mg Battery-A Review.

Zhongting Wang, Rongrui Deng, Yumei Wang, Fusheng Pan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhongting WangNational Engineering Research Center for Magnesium Alloys, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China.
Rongrui DengNational University of Singapore (Chongqing) Research Institute, Chongqing 401123, China.
Yumei WangNational University of Singapore (Chongqing) Research Institute, Chongqing 401123, China.
Fusheng PanNational Engineering Research Center for Magnesium Alloys, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China.

Funding

Chongqing Innovative Project for oversea-experience researchers cx2023037Chongqing Postdoctoral Research Special Funding 2021XM2002Overseas Postdoctoral Research Start-up Funding, Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The solid electrolyte interface (SEI) plays a critical role in determining the performance, stability, and longevity of batteries. This review comprehensively compares the construction strategies of the SEI in Li and Mg batteries, focusing on the differences and similarities in their formation, composition, and functionality. The SEI in Li batteries is well-studied, with established strategies that leverage organic and inorganic components to enhance ion diffusion and mitigate side reactions. In contrast, the development of the SEI in Mg batteries is still in its initial stages, facing significant challenges such as severe passivation and slower ion kinetics due to the divalent nature of magnesium ions. This review highlights various approaches to engineering SEIs in both battery systems, including electrolyte optimization, additives, and surface modifications. Furthermore, it discusses the impact of these strategies on electrochemical performance, cycle life, and safety. The comparison provides insights into the underlying mechanisms, challenges, and future directions for SEI research.

Indexed as

lithium-ion batterymagnesium-ion batterysolid electrolyte interface (SEI)

Identifiers

PMID39407689
PMCPMC11478401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.