ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Systematic Comparison of Extract Clean-Up with Currently Used Sorbents for Dispersive Solid-Phase Extraction.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating liquid-liquid extraction and dispersive solid-phase extraction cleanup for high-throughput profiling of 11 neonicotinoids and 6 metabolites in human urine by HPLC-Q-Orbitrap HRMS.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Microchemical Techniques for Multiclass Fungicide Residue Analysis in Complex Food Matrices.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Pesticide Residues in Vegetables: The Potential Risk Assessment of Endocrine and Reproductive Disruptors for Children and Adults.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Suspected and Non-Targeted Screening of Non-Edible Substances in Food by UPLC-Q-TOF-MS.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Impact of Volatile and Non-Volatile Co-Extracted Matrix Components on the Reproducible Residue Analysis of Pesticides Using GC-MS/MS.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Machine learning prediction and calibration of cellulose-based solid-phase extraction performance for pharmaceuticals across aqueous matrices.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Analytical Methodologies for Benzo[a]pyrene in Foods: A Review of Advances in Sample Preparation and Detection Techniques.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A modified QuEChERS method coupled with GC-MS/MS for the rapid and simultaneous analysis of polybrominated diphenyl ethers and novel brominated flame retardant residues in animal-derived foods.Food chemistry: X · 2025Article
- Carbon nanotubes stabilized in chitosan sponge (CNT-CS) as a new alternative clean-up sorbent for pesticide multiresidue determination in eggplants using QuEChERS and UHPLC-MS/MS.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dispersive solid-phase extraction (dSPE) is a crucial step for multiresidue analysis used to remove matrix components from extracts. This purification prevents contamination of instrumental equipment and improves method selectivity, sensitivity, and reproducibility. Therefore, a clean-up step is recommended, but an over-purified extract can lead to analyte loss due to adsorption to the sorbent. This study provides a systematic comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of the well-established dSPE sorbents PSA, GCB, and C18 and the novel dSPE sorbents chitin, chitosan, multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT), and Z-Sep
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.