ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Analytical Insights into Methods for Measuring Ischemia-Modified Albumin.
Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oxidative Stress, Environmental Pollutants, Aging, and Epigenetic Regulation: Mechanistic Insights and Biomarker Advances.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Binding and transport functions of human serum albumin and its clinical implications in liver disease: a narrative review.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
- Recurrent aphthous stomatitis, oxidative stress, and ischemia modified albumin: A cross-sectional study.Medicine · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ischemia-modified albumin (IMA) has emerged as a pivotal biomarker for the early detection of ischemic conditions, particularly myocardial ischemia, where timely diagnosis is crucial for effective intervention. This review provides an overview of the analytical methods for assessment of IMA, including Albumin Cobalt Binding (ACB), Albumin Copper Binding (ACuB), Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), new techniques such as liquid crystal biosensors (LCB), quantum dot coupled X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (Q-XRF), mass spectrometry (MS), and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. Each method was thoroughly examined for its analytical performance in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and feasibility. The ACB assay is the most readily implementable method in clinical laboratories for its cost-effectiveness and operational simplicity. On the other hand, the ACuB assay exhibits enhanced sensitivity and specificity, driven by the superior binding affinity of copper to IMA. Furthermore, nanoparticle-enhanced immunoassays and liquid crystal biosensors, while more resource-intensive, significantly improve the analytical sensitivity and specificity of IMA detection, enabling earlier and more accurate identification of ischemic events. Additionally, different biological matrices, such as serum, saliva, and urine, were reviewed to identify the most suitable for accurate measurements in clinical application. Although serum was considered the gold standard, non-invasive matrices such as saliva and urine are becoming increasingly feasible due to advances in technology. This review underscores the role of IMA in clinical diagnostics and suggests how advanced analytical techniques have the potential to significantly enhance patient outcomes in ischemic disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.