Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39407539›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Differences in the Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds between

Gaigai Liu, Hao Duan, Yue Zheng, Jinhong Guo, Diandian Wang, Wenjie Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gaigai LiuCollege of Biochemical Engineering, Beijing Union University, Beijing 100023, China.
Hao DuanCollege of Biochemical Engineering, Beijing Union University, Beijing 100023, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1302-8873
Yue ZhengCollege of Biochemical Engineering, Beijing Union University, Beijing 100023, China.
Jinhong GuoCollege of Biochemical Engineering, Beijing Union University, Beijing 100023, China.ORCID 0009-0006-6086-4224
Diandian WangCollege of Biochemical Engineering, Beijing Union University, Beijing 100023, China.
Wenjie YanCollege of Biochemical Engineering, Beijing Union University, Beijing 100023, China.

Funding

the National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFF1103802
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chrysanthemums and wild chrysanthemums are herbs with high application value. As edible plants of the Asteraceae family, they have good antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and hepatoprotective properties. Chrysanthemums and wild chrysanthemums contain a wide variety of volatile organic compounds, and these volatile components are the main factors contributing to the flavor differences. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the volatile components of holland chrysanthemum from Bozhou, Anhui Province, Chu-chrysanthemum from Chuzhou, Anhui Province, Gong-chrysanthemums from Huangshan, Anhui Province, Huai-chrysanthemums from Jiaozuo, Henan Province, Hang-chrysanthemum from Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, and wild chrysanthemum from Dabie Mountain by headspace-gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (HS-GC-IMS) coupled with principal component analysis (PCA). The results showed that Chrysanthemum and wild chrysanthemum contain alcohols, esters, hydrocarbons, ketones, aldehydes, acids, camphor, pyrazines and furans. Among them, alcohols, esters and hydrocarbons accounted for more than 15%. It was hypothesized that 2-methyl-1-propanol, 2-methylbutanol, 1-hexanol in alcohols and hexyl acetate, 3-methylbutyl acetate and ethyl 2-methylpropanoate in esters might be the main reasons for the alcoholic and sweet flavors of chrysanthemum and chrysanthemum officinale. Based on the principal component analysis, cluster analysis with the Euclidean distance and similarity analysis of fingerprints, it was found that there were significant differences in the volatile components in chrysanthemums from different origins, among which the differences between Chu-chrysanthemum and Hang-chrysanthemum were the most significant. In addition, as a genus of wild chrysanthemum with the same species, it contains a richer variety of volatile organic compounds, and the content of hydrocarbons and alcohols is significantly higher than that of chrysanthemum.

Indexed as

ChrysanthemumGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryVolatile Organic CompoundsPrincipal Component AnalysisVolatile Organic CompoundschrysanthemumHS-GC-IMSvolatile organic compoundwild chrysanthemum

Identifiers

PMID39407539
PMCPMC11477720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.