ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Design and Optimization of Nanoporous Materials as Catalysts for Oxygen Evolution Reaction-A Review.
Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Latest Progress in Pd-Based Metallenes: From Formation Mechanism, Structural Design, Optimization Strategies to Electrocatalytic Applications.ACS omega · 2026Review
- From Biomass Waste to Multifunctional Biochar: Tailored Preparation and Emerging Applications in Energy, Environment, and Sensing.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Nanostructured Catalysts for Electro- and Photocatalytic Energy Conversion: Design Strategies, Mechanistic Descriptors, and Practical Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Amorphous NiFe oxide derived from an air-pyrolyzed Prussian blue analogue with rapid complete reconstruction for enhanced oxygen evolution reaction.Nanoscale advances · 2026Article
- A Practical Guide to Heterogeneous Catalysis in Hydrocarbon Transformations.Chemistry, an Asian journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the growing demand for new energy sources, electrochemical water splitting for hydrogen production is a technology that must be vigorously promoted. Therefore, to improve the efficiency of the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) at the anode, high-performance OER catalysts are essential. Given their advantages in electrocatalysis, nanoporous materials have garnered considerable attention in previous studies for OER applications. This review provides a comprehensive overview of various strategies to optimize active site utilization in nanoporous materials. These strategies include regulating pore size and porosity, constructing hierarchical nanoporous structures, and enhancing material conductivity. Additionally, it covers approaches to boost the intrinsic OER activity of nanoporous materials, such as tuning the composition of anions and cations, creating vacancies, constructing interfaces, and forming boundary active sites. While nanoporous materials offer significant potential for advancing OER, challenges remain, including difficulties in quantifying activity within nanopores, the unclear impact of nanoporous material morphology, challenges in accessing nanopore interiors with in situ techniques, and a lack of theoretical calculations on pore structure. However, these challenges also present opportunities, and we hope this review provides a fresh perspective to inspire future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.