ArticleBritish journal of haematology2025
Course of immune thrombocytopenia according to the site of platelet destruction identified by indium-111 platelet scintigraphy.
Article in British journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The glycan fingerprint in immune thrombocytopenia.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
- Course of immune thrombocytopenia according to the site of platelet destruction identified by indium-111 platelet scintigraphy.British journal of haematology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), predictors of disease evolution and treatment response are needed. Data based on the site of platelet destruction are scarce. We performed a retrospective single-centre study of adult patients with primary ITP undergoing at least one Indium-111 platelet scintigraphy (IPS) between 2009 and 2018. Thirty-three patients had isolated hepatic platelet destruction (H-group), and 97 isolated splenic destruction (S-group). Median age at diagnosis (p < 0.001), proportion of associated cardiovascular (p < 0.001), organ-specific autoimmune diseases (p = 0.02), dependence on steroids (p = 0.003) and failure to rituximab (p = 0.01) were higher and relapse more frequent (p = 0.03) in H-group compared to non-splenectomized patients in S-group. Splenectomy was only performed in patients from S-group (as patients with hepatic sequestration are not splenectomized in our centre): 79% were in relapse-free remission at the end of a median 3.4-year post-IPS follow-up, 16% relapsed. In multivariate analyses, only a history of organ-specific autoimmune or inflammatory disease was significantly associated with hepatic sequestration (OR = 4.3, 95% CI = 1.2-15, p = 0.02). Patients with isolated hepatic sequestration were older, had more cardiovascular events and organ-specific autoimmune diseases, greater dependence on steroids, more relapses and a decreased response rate to rituximab suggesting an increased refractoriness to immunomodulatory therapies. Patients with isolated splenic sequestration responded well to splenectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.