Contact allergic dermatitis to skin adhesive after CIED upgrade procedure.

Kishore Raja Raja, Paul Bigliardi, Brenda Dugas, Michael White, Erick Jimenez, Bradley C Clark

Abstract readCase Reports

In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

Contact allergic dermatitis to skin adhesive after CIED upgrade procedure.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2024
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kishore Raja RajaDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Paul BigliardiDepartment of Dermatology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Brenda DugasDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Michael WhiteDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Erick JimenezDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6507-7007

Bradley C ClarkDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8186-8471

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe utilization of skin adhesives for closure is typically secondary to its noninvasive application and aesthetic benefits. Allergic reactions to Dermabond™ can occur, though there are no reported cases in pediatric patients following cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. The allergic reaction to skin glues is typically to cyanoacrylates, the primary component of Dermabond™. METHODS AND

resultsThis report describes severe allergic contact dermatitis due to sensitization to cyanoacrylate in an 18-year-old with repaired congenital heart disease and postoperative atrioventricular block following CIED upgrade procedure.

conclusionThis demonstrates the importance of prompt diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis, which can be confused with local infections.

Indexed as

CyanoacrylatesDermatitis, Allergic ContactTissue AdhesivesAdolescentAtrioventricular BlockDefibrillators, ImplantableHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansMalePacemaker, ArtificialPatch TestsTreatment OutcomeCyanoacrylatesTissue Adhesivescardiac implantable electronic devicecongenital heart diseasecontact dermatitis

Identifiers

PMID39407359

DOI10.1111/jce.16465

PMCPMC11650539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY-NC

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.