Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39407339›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2024

Combating wheat yellow mosaic virus through microbial interactions and hormone pathway modulations.

Fangyan Wang, Haoqing Zhang, Hongwei Liu, Chuanfa Wu, Yi Wan, Lifei Zhu, Jian Yang, Peng Cai, Jianping Chen, Tida Ge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fangyan WangState Key Laboratory for Managing Biotic and Chemical Threats to the Quality and Safety of Agro-products, Key Laboratory of Biotechnology in Plant Protection of Ministry of Agriculture and Zhejiang Province, Institute of Plant Virology, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China.
Haoqing ZhangState Key Laboratory for Managing Biotic and Chemical Threats to the Quality and Safety of Agro-products, Key Laboratory of Biotechnology in Plant Protection of Ministry of Agriculture and Zhejiang Province, Institute of Plant Virology, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China. zhanghaoqing@nbu.edu.cn.
Hongwei LiuHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, 2753, Australia.
Chuanfa WuState Key Laboratory for Managing Biotic and Chemical Threats to the Quality and Safety of Agro-products, Key Laboratory of Biotechnology in Plant Protection of Ministry of Agriculture and Zhejiang Province, Institute of Plant Virology, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China.
Yi WanState Key Laboratory for Managing Biotic and Chemical Threats to the Quality and Safety of Agro-products, Key Laboratory of Biotechnology in Plant Protection of Ministry of Agriculture and Zhejiang Province, Institute of Plant Virology, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China.
Lifei ZhuState Key Laboratory for Managing Biotic and Chemical Threats to the Quality and Safety of Agro-products, Key Laboratory of Biotechnology in Plant Protection of Ministry of Agriculture and Zhejiang Province, Institute of Plant Virology, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China.
Jian YangState Key Laboratory for Managing Biotic and Chemical Threats to the Quality and Safety of Agro-products, Key Laboratory of Biotechnology in Plant Protection of Ministry of Agriculture and Zhejiang Province, Institute of Plant Virology, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China.
Peng CaiNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Jianping ChenState Key Laboratory for Managing Biotic and Chemical Threats to the Quality and Safety of Agro-products, Key Laboratory of Biotechnology in Plant Protection of Ministry of Agriculture and Zhejiang Province, Institute of Plant Virology, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China.
Tida GeState Key Laboratory for Managing Biotic and Chemical Threats to the Quality and Safety of Agro-products, Key Laboratory of Biotechnology in Plant Protection of Ministry of Agriculture and Zhejiang Province, Institute of Plant Virology, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China. getida@nbu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rhizosphere microbiome is critical for promoting plant growth and mitigating soil-borne pathogens. However, its role in fighting soil-borne virus-induced diseases, such as wheat yellow mosaic virus (WYMV) transmitted by Polymyxa graminis zoospores, remains largely underexplored. In this study, we hypothesized that during viral infections, plant microbiomes engage in critical interactions with plants, with key microbes playing vital roles in maintaining plant health. Our research aimed to identify microbial taxa that not only suppress the disease but also boost wheat yield by using a blend of techniques, including field surveys, yield assessments, high-throughput sequencing of plant and soil microbiomes, microbial isolation, hydroponic experiments, and transcriptome sequencing.

resultsWe found that, compared with roots and leaves, the rhizosphere microbiome showed a better performance in predicting wheat yield and the prevalence of P. graminis and WYMV across the three WYMV-impacted regions in China. Using machine learning, we found that healthy rhizospheres were marked with potentially beneficial microorganisms, such as Sphingomonas and Allorhizobium-Neorhizobium-Parararhizobium-Rhizobium, whereas diseased rhizospheres were associated with a higher prevalence of potential pathogens, such as Bipolaris and Fusicolla. Structural equation modeling showed that these biomarkers both directly and indirectly impacted wheat yield by modulating the rhizosphere microbiome and P. graminis abundance. Upon re-introduction of two key healthy rhizosphere biomarkers, Sphingomonas azotifigens and Rhizobium deserti, into the rhizosphere, wheat growth and health were enhanced. This was attributed to the up-regulation of auxin and cytokinin signaling pathways and the regulation of jasmonic acid and salicylic acid pathways during infections.

conclusionsOverall, our study revealed the critical role of the rhizosphere microbiome in combating soil-borne viral diseases, with specific rhizosphere microbes playing key roles in this process. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

Microbial InteractionsPlant DiseasesPlant Growth RegulatorsRhizosphereSoil MicrobiologyTriticumChinaIndoleacetic AcidsMicrobiotaPlant LeavesPlant RootsIndoleacetic AcidsPlant Growth RegulatorsJasmonic acidPlant-associated microbiomePolymyxa graminisRhizosphereSalicylic acidSoil-borne viral diseaseTriticum aestivum L

Identifiers

PMID39407339
PMCPMC11481568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.