ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2024
Coronary artery bypass grafting in dialysis patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Surgical Outcomes of in situ Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting in Patients with Ipsilateral Upper-Extremity Arteriovenous Fistulas.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients undergoing dialysis treatment have long been recognized as having an elevated risk of developing coronary artery disease necessitating coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, the prognostic implications of CABG in dialysis-dependent patients remain underexplored. This study aimed to comprehensively assess both short- and long-term outcomes in dialysis-dependent patients undergoing CABG.
methodsIn this retrospective analysis, we meticulously matched 55 dialysis-dependent patients with 55 non-dialysis patients, controlling for baseline characteristics including age, sex, etiology, and date of surgery. All patients underwent CABG treatment at our institution between January 2014 and June 2022. We conducted a comparative analysis of postoperative complications and survival rates between the two groups.
resultsOur findings revealed that the dialysis-dependent group exhibited a significantly higher incidence of postoperative complications compared to the non-dialysis group (92.7% vs. 61.8%; p < 0.001). Furthermore, the 5-year survival rates were notably diminished among dialysis patients relative to their non-dialysis counterparts (46.2 ± 7.9% vs. 58.2 ± 12.1%, p = 0.045). Consistently, dialysis patients exhibited decreased 5-year cardiac-event-free rates in contrast to non-dialysis patients (31.6 ± 7.6% vs. 58.8 ± 11.3%, p = 0.041). Predictably, several baseline parameters were identified as significant risk factors contributing to adverse outcomes among dialysis patients, including a history of smoking, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure upon admission, and the requirement for intraoperative concomitant surgery (p = 0.006, p = 0.043, p = 0.017, p = 0.003, respectively).
conclusionsThis study underscores the poorer prognosis associated with CABG treatment in dialysis-dependent patients. Notably, baseline factors such as a smoking history, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure upon admission, and the need for intraoperative concomitant surgery were all independently linked to increased mortality in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.