Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39407325›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

UROPOT: study protocol for a randomized, double-blind phase I/II trial for metabolism-based potentiation of antimicrobial prophylaxis in the urological tract.

Kevin Stritt, Beat Roth, Audrey Masnada, Felix Hammann, Damien Jacot, Sonia Domingos-Pereira, François Crettenand, Perrine Bohner, Isabelle Sommer, Emilien Bréat and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05761405 (Metabolic Potentiation of Aminoglycosides), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05761405 early_phase1unknown statusnot on this map

Metabolic Potentiation of Aminoglycosides: a Novel Antimicrobial Strategy to Prevent Urinary Tract Infections (UROPOT TRIAL).

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire VaudoisRan2024 to 2026Enrolled90ConditionsUrinary Tract Infections, Urological System Complication of ProcedureArmsmannitol-enhanced aminoglycoside, Ceftriaxon, Amikacin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Kevin Stritt *Department of Urology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Beat Roth *Department of Urology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Audrey MasnadaDepartment of Urology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Felix HammannDivision of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Damien JacotInstitute of Microbiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Sonia Domingos-PereiraUrology Research Unit and Urology Biobank, Department of Urology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
François CrettenandDepartment of Urology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Perrine BohnerDepartment of Urology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Isabelle SommerService of Pharmacy, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Emilien BréatClinical Trial Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Julien SauserClinical Trial Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Laurent DerréUrology Research Unit and Urology Biobank, Department of Urology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Manuel HaschkeDivision of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
James J CollinsInfectious Disease and Microbiome Program, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
John McKinneySchool of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland.
Sylvain MeylanInfectious Diseases Service, Internal Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. sylvain.meylan@chuv.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6319-2423

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrinary tract catheters, including Double-J or ureteral stents, are prone to bacterial colonization forming biofilms and leading to asymptomatic bacteriuria. In the context of asymptomatic bacteriuria, endourological procedures causing mucosa-inducing lesions can lead to severe infections. Antibiotic prophylaxis is warranted, yet its efficacy is limited by biofilm formation on stents. Biofilms promote antibiotic tolerance, the capacity of genetically susceptible bacteria to survive a normally lethal dose of antimicrobial therapy. The UROPOT study evaluates the effectiveness of a first-in-type metabolism-based aminoglycoside potentiation for (i) preventing infectious complications of asymptomatic bacteriuria during mucosa lesion-inducing endourological procedures and (ii) assessing its anti-tolerance efficacy.

methodsThe UROPOT trial is a phase I/II single-center (Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Switzerland) randomized double-blinded trial. Over 2 years, patients with asymptomatic Escherichia coli and/or Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteriuria, undergoing endourological procedures, will be randomly allocated to one of three treatment arms (1:1:1 randomization ratio, 30 patients per group) to evaluate the efficacy of mannitol-potentiated low-dose amikacin compared to established standard treatments (ceftriaxone or amikacin standard dose). Patients will be recruited at the CHUV Urology Outpatient Clinic. The primary outcome is the comparative incidence of postoperative urinary tract infections (assessed at 48 h) between the investigational amikacin/mannitol therapy and standard (ceftriaxone or amikacin) antibiotic prophylaxis, defined by specific systemic symptoms and/or positive blood and/or urine culture. Secondary outcomes include assessing microbiological eradication through anti-biofilm activity, sustained microbiological eradication, and mannitol and antibiotics pharmacokinetics in blood and urine. Safety outcomes will evaluate the incidence of adverse events following amikacin/mannitol therapy and postoperative surgical complications at postoperative day 14. DISCUSSION: UROPOT tests a novel antimicrobial strategy based on "metabolic potentiation" for prophylaxis enabling aminoglycoside dose reduction and targeting biofilm activity. The anti-biofilm effect may prove beneficial, particularly in patients who have a permanent stent in situ needing recurrent endourological manipulations strategies in preventing infections and achieving sustained microbiological eradication in pre-stented patients.

trial registrationThe protocol is approved by the local ethics committee (CER-VD, 2023-01369, protocole 2.0) and the Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products (Swissmedic, 701,676) and is registered on the NIH's ClinicalTrials.gov (trial registration number: NCT05761405). Registered on March 07, 2023.

Indexed as

AmikacinAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisBacteriuriaBiofilmsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicDouble-Blind MethodEscherichia coliHumansKlebsiella pneumoniaeMannitolSwitzerlandTreatment OutcomeUrinary Tract InfectionsAmikacinAnti-Bacterial AgentsMannitolAntimicrobial prophylaxisBiofilmEndourological proceduresPostoperative infectionsPotentiated aminoglycosides

Identifiers

PMID39407325
PMCPMC11476011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.