ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2024
Oral functions in adult persons with spinal muscular atrophy compared to a healthy control group: a prospective cross-sectional study with a multimodal approach.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rehabilitation management for patients with spinal muscular atrophy: a review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOral function tests have been shown to reliably detect impaired bulbar function in adults with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Although not routinely recorded, it is known that persons with SMA are affected to varying degrees. Detecting differences in bite and tongue force, endurance, and maximum mouth opening has become particularly promising since the introduction of causal therapy for SMA. This study aimed to compare oral function among adult persons with SMA with different SMA types, walking abilities, and treatment status to a healthy control group.
methodsData from oral function tests conducted on 58 persons with SMA and 45 healthy individuals were analyzed. Differences in oral function between SMA subgroups were pairwise tested and compared to the healthy control group using Wilcoxon rank sum tests.
resultsIn an overall comparison, three out of five oral function tests revealed lower values for the SMA group compared to the control group. Subgroup analyses indicated lower scores for most oral function tests in non-ambulatory, untreated patients with SMA type 2 compared to controls. Ambulatory, treated patients with SMA type 3 achieved strength and endurance values comparable to those of healthy individuals.
conclusionsThe impairment of oral function varies across persons with SMA. Routine measurement of oral function is warranted to determine individual bulbar involvement stages. Further evaluation should be scheduled if indicators such as restricted maximum mouth opening arise. Trial registration DRKS, DRKS00015842. Registered 30 July 2019, https://drks.de/register/de/trial/DRKS00015842/preview .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.