ArticleJournal of translational medicine2024
Differential methylation of circulating free DNA assessed through cfMeDiP as a new tool for breast cancer diagnosis and detection of BRCA1/2 mutation.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-invasive screening in hereditary cancer: a randomized controlled trial to test cell-free DNA-based early detection in the CHARM consortium.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Trial
- Circulating Cell-Free DNA Methylation Profiling Enables Detection, Distinction, and Estrogen Receptor Status Classification of Advanced Breast Cancer.Cancer research · 2026Article
- Biological basis and clinical translation prospects of circulating cell-free DNA in precision management of breast cancer (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Circulating cell-free methylated DNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (cfMeDIP-seq) in oncology: from technological advances to clinical applications.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- Development, characterization, and inter-laboratory validation of methylated human cell free DNA candidate reference materials.Clinical epigenetics · 2026Article
- The expanding roles of homologous recombination proteins in genome stability.The EMBO journal · 2026Review
- Managing healthcare for female BRCA carriers in the population screening era: developing a harmonized national policy for surveillance and risk-reduction.Israel journal of health policy research · 2026Article
- The Great Potential of DNA Methylation in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: From Biological Basics to Clinical Application.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Liquid Biopsy in Early Screening of Cancers: Emerging Technologies and New Prospects.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- The intratumoral microbiota in breast cancer: from basic research to clinical translation.Gut microbes · 2025Review
- Liquid biopsy in breast cancer: Redefining precision medicine.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2025Review
- Genome-Wide cfDNA Methylation Profiling Reveals Robust Hypermethylation Signatures in Ovarian Cancer.Cancers · 2025Article
- Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Assay of DNA Cytosine Methylation Excretion from Biological Systems.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Constructing a Prognostic Model for Subtypes of Colorectal Cancer Based on Machine Learning and Immune Infiltration-Related Genes.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical Management of Circulating Tumor DNA in Breast Cancer: Detection, Prediction, and Monitoring.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2025Review
- From sensitivity to public health: integrating cfMeDIP-seq into early breast cancer detection strategies.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecent studies have highlighted the importance of the cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylation profile in detecting breast cancer (BC) and its different subtypes. We investigated whether plasma cfDNA methylation, using cell-free Methylated DNA Immunoprecipitation and High-Throughput Sequencing (cfMeDIP-seq), may be informative in characterizing breast cancer in patients with BRCA1/2 germline mutations for early cancer detection and response to therapy.
methodsWe enrolled 23 BC patients with germline mutation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, 19 healthy controls without BRCA1/2 mutation, and two healthy individuals who carried BRCA1/2 mutations. Blood samples were collected for all study subjects at the diagnosis, and plasma was isolated by centrifugation. Cell-free DNA was extracted from 1 mL of plasma, and cfMeDIP-seq was performed for each sample. Shallow whole genome sequencing was performed on the immuno-precipitated samples. Then, the differentially methylated 300-bp regions (DMRs) between 25 BRCA germline mutation carriers and 19 non-carriers were identified. DMRs were compared with tumor-specific regions from public datasets to perform an unbiased analysis. Finally, two statistical classifiers were trained based on the GLMnet and random forest model to evaluate if the identified DMRs could discriminate BRCA-positive from healthy samples.
resultsWe identified 7,095 hypermethylated and 212 hypomethylated regions in 25 BRCA germline mutation carriers compared to 19 controls. These regions discriminate tumors from healthy samples with high accuracy and sensitivity. We show that the circulating tumor DNA of BRCA1/2 mutant breast cancers is characterized by the hypomethylation of genes involved in DNA repair and cell cycle. We uncovered the TFs associated with these DRMs and identified that proteins of the Erythroblast Transformation Specific (ETS) family are particularly active in the hypermethylated regions. Finally, we assessed that these regions could discriminate between BRCA positives from healthy samples with an AUC of 0.95, a sensitivity of 88%, and a specificity of 94.74%.
conclusionsOur study emphasizes the importance of tumor cell-derived DNA methylation in BC, reporting a different methylation profile between patients carrying mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, and wild-type controls. Our minimally invasive approach could allow early cancer diagnosis, assessment of minimal residual disease, and monitoring of response to therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.