Trial reportBMC surgery2024
Evaluation of electrophotobiomodulation as a recent tool in the armamentarium of treatment of fingertip injuries.
Trial report in BMC surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraditional reconstructive options of fingertip injuries are technically difficult, usually need donor site skin grafting, leave visible scars, and need a protracted period of finger immobilization resulting in joint stiffness. Electro-photobiomodulation (EPBM), is the process of combining intense pulsed light and radiofrequency to modify tissues to help the body heal itself, lower inflammation, and promote wound healing. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis study included 60 patients presented with fingertip injuries. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 includes patients who were treated by EPBM. Group 2 includes patients who were treated by cross finger flap (CFF). Six months after complete healing, evaluation was performed for aesthetic and functional outcome and patient satisfaction.
resultsCompared to group 2 patients, group 1 patients had statistically significant better sensory outcome, better total active motion of affected digits, grip strength, patient satisfaction, healing time, and plastic surgeon general aesthetic evaluation and also, they had statistically significant less adverse events and cold intolerance with absent donor site pain and deformity.
conclusionEPBM is safe and effective treatment of fingertip injuries which shortens the healing time, produces the best aesthetic and functional result while avoiding donor site morbidity of the traditional reconstructive options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.