ArticleBMC health services research2024
Readiness of the health system to provide non-communicable disease services in Nepal: a comparison between the 2015 and 2021 comprehensive health facility surveys.
Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Capacity and service readiness of facilities for non-communicable diseases in Bangladesh: a health system perspective from two selected districts.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Equity in the continuum of hypertension care: evidence from a nationally representative survey in Nepal.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Primary healthcare system readiness for the prevention and management of non-communicable diseases in Nepal.Discover public health · 2026Article
- Barriers and facilitators to patient utilization of noncommunicable disease services in primary healthcare facilities in Nepal: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Nepal, despite the escalating burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), there is a gap in the continuum of care for prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and care services for NCDs. The study aimed at assessing the changes in availability and readiness scores of health facilities between two consecutive health facility surveys.
methodsWe compared NCD readiness scores between 2015 and 2021, using data from two nationally representative cross-sectional Nepal Health Facility Surveys (NHFS). Both consecutive surveys used globally validated standard tools of Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS)'s service provision assessment. Both surveys were undertaken using World Health Organization's (WHO) service availability and readiness assessment (SARA) tools. Data were collected using the Census and Survey Processing System on tablets, with validation performed through field check tables. Trained enumerators with a medical background collected data for the surveys, and we analyzed the information from a de-identified dataset downloaded from the DHS website upon request. Both the NHFS protocols were reviewed and approved by the Nepal Health Research Council and the institutional review board of ICF. We calculated the readiness scores based on WHO SARA indicators for diabetes, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and chronic respiratory disease (CRD) using a additive procedure. Multivariate linear regression analysis was undertaken to assess associated factors, with complex sampling design accounting for both surveys.
resultsThe overall availability of all three services has improved between 2015 and 2021 NHFS. Although the availability of diabetes-related services increased significantly between 2015 and 2021, this does not correspond to the increase in the readiness score. The readiness score increased by 10% points for CVDs related services and 9% points for CRDs. Compared to public hospitals, primary healthcare facilities experienced greater increase in readiness scores (11.5% versus 20.9%). Interestingly, those health facilities without quality assurance systems experienced a lower increase or even decrease in readiness scores than those with quality assurance systems. For the factors associated with readiness scores, health facilities charging additional or separate fees to the patients had a higher readiness score than those not charging any user fee for all three services. Compared to 2015, the readiness scores in 2021 improved for diabetes [β = 11.01 (95% CI 9.02 to 12.96)], CVD [β = 10.70 (95% CI 9.61 to 11.80)], and CRD [β = 8.41 (95% CI 7.20 to 9.62)].
conclusionThe improvement in NCD service availability does not correspond to the proportional increase in readiness scores, which is crucial for delivering quality care. Regular staff meetings and feedback systems are crucial for improving all services including NCD-related service readiness and should be prioritized by local and provincial governments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.