ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2024
Prognostic significance of preoperative nutritional status for heart transplantation patients.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Article
- Article
- Validation of the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score and the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) for Predicting Leakage and Surgical Complications After Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction: A Pilot Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe association between malnutrition and outcomes of heart transplantation (HTx) has not been well studied. The purpose of this article was to evaluate the prognostic value of three different nutrition indices in HTx, including CONUT (Controlling Nutritional Status), NRI (Nutritional Risk Index) and GNRI (Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index).
methodsA total of 438 patients who underwent THx from January 2015 to December 2020 were included in this study. The nutritional status of the patients was evaluated by CONUT, NRI and GNRI. Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were constructed to compare the difference in overall survival (OS) between the normal and malnutrition groups in each index. Cox regression analysis was used to identify the independent risk factors of OS. The predictive power was compared by time-dependent ROC and time-dependent ccurves. Logistic regression model was used to evaluate the relationship between these three nutrition indices and postoperative clinical events.
results336 (76.7%), 183 (43.8%), and 190 (43.4%) patients had malnutrition according to CONUT, NRI and GNRI calculations. 102 (23.3%) patients had died at the end of follow-up. After adjustment for confounding variables, multivariate Cox analysis showed that CONUT [HR 1.286 (95%CI 1.166 ~ 1.419); p < 0.001], NRI [HR 0.942 (95%CI 0.923 ~ 0.962); p < 0.001] and GNRI [HR 0.959 (95%CI 0.939 ~ 0.979); p < 0.001] were all independent predictors for OS. The predictive power of CONUT score was higher than that of NRI (p = 0.045) and GNRI (p < 0.001). Regarding the postoperative complications, multivariate logistic regression model showed that malnutrition assessed by CONUT [HR 1.156 (95%CI 1.032 ~ 1.294); p = 0.012] and NRI [HR 1.543 (95%CI 1.008 ~ 2.362); p = 0.046] was independent risk factors for posttransplant infections.
conclusionPoor nutritional status, as assessed by CONUT, NRI and GNRI, was associated with an increased risk of mortality after HTx. CONUT displayed the highest predictive power compared to the other two indices. CONUT and NRI were also independently associated with posttransplant infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.