Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39407102›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2024

An example of the adaptation of the Nominal Group Technique (NGT) to a virtual format (vNGT) within healthcare research.

Frances Riley-Bennett, Lal Russell, Rebecca Fisher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Frances Riley-BennettUniversity of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. frances.riley-bennett@nottingham.ac.uk.
Lal RussellUniversity of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Rebecca FisherUniversity of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Funding

NIHR-ARC East Midlands NIHR200171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) has been used to establish clinical priorities and generate guidelines within healthcare since its creation over fifty years ago. It is characterised by its five distinct stages; introduction, silent idea generation, 'round robin', clarifications and rating or ranking. A key element traditionally has been the inclusion of face-to-face discussion, however in the context of COVID-19 innovations were required. This article provides a case study illustrating an adaptation of the NGT to a virtual format (vNGT) and outlines the processes involved in a virtual NGT (vNGT), using an illustrative study exploring the rehabilitation of stroke survivors. The vNGT offers opportunities for global collaborations without the constraints of geography or incurred costs. Future studies should evaluate it's acceptability for stroke survivors to enable their participation within research.Summary statement1. This study provides a guide for the use of virtual nominal group technique (vNGT), using a freely available video-conferencing platform2. vNGT increases opportunities for global collaborations whilst incurring minimal costs.3. It remains unclear how feasible this procedure is with patient populations who have potentially less digital confidence and access.This work was supported by NIHR ARC-East Midlands, Grant number NIHR200171.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health Services ResearchHumansSARS-CoV-2Stroke RehabilitationVideoconferencingConsensusMethodologyNominal Group TechniqueVirtual

Identifiers

PMID39407102
PMCPMC11476593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.