Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39407052›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2024

Unveiling Genetic Diversity Among Bacterial Isolates Using SCoT Markers.

Fatih Tekin, İrem Altın, Furkan Aydın, Mehtap Alkan, Didem Canik Orel, Mustafa Ardıç, Katarina Gašić, Tamás Kovács, Caitilyn Allen, Göksel Özer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fatih TekinDepartment of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University, 14030, Bolu, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4237-4858
İrem AltınDepartment of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Düzce University, 81620, Düzce, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3293-9894
Furkan AydınDepartment of Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Aksaray University, 68100, Aksaray, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2924-5434
Mehtap AlkanDepartment of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University, 14030, Bolu, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7923-8892
Didem Canik OrelDepartment of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Ankara University, 06110, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8140-379X
Mustafa ArdıçDepartment of Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Aksaray University, 68100, Aksaray, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4193-1990
Katarina GašićInstitute for Plant Protection and Environment, Teodora Drajzera 9, 11040, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2280-4582
Tamás KovácsNanophagetherapy Center, Enviroinvest Corp, Kertvaros U. 2, 7632, Pecs, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6647-8136
Caitilyn AllenUniversity of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5805-8000
Göksel ÖzerDepartment of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University, 14030, Bolu, Turkey. gokozer@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3385-2520

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to unveil the genetic diversity among 47 bacterial isolates from various species using start codon targeted (SCoT) markers. Six SCoT primers yielded 219 reproducible bands, with 89.04% exhibiting polymorphism. The amplification process generated 28 to 50 fragments per primer, with an average of 36.50. Genetic diversity was quantified using polymorphic information content (PIC) values ranging from 0.11 to 0.14, with SCoT32 showing the highest PIC (0.14) and SCoT23 the lowest (0.11). The resolving power (RP) index, used to assess primer discriminatory power, varied significantly, with SCoT23 demonstrating the highest RP (6.00) and SCoT29 the lowest (4.51). Comparative analysis with conventional markers like M13 and (GTG)

Indexed as

BacteriaGenetic VariationPhylogenyCodon, InitiatorDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersGenetic MarkersPolymorphism, GeneticRNA, Ribosomal, 16SCodon, InitiatorDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersGenetic MarkersRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.