ArticleDiscover oncology2024
Preoperative discrimination of invasive and non-invasive breast cancer using machine learning based on automated breast volume scanning (ABVS) radiomics and virtual touch quantification (VTQ).
Article in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Efficacy of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse in Staging of Lower Limb Intramuscular Venous Thrombosis: A Single-Center Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026Article
- Identification of intracranial solitary fibrous tumor and atypical meningioma by multi-parameter MRI-based radiomics model.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeEvaluating the efficacy of machine learning for preoperative differentiation between invasive and non-invasive breast cancer through integrated automated breast volume scanning (ABVS) radiomics and virtual touch quantification (VTQ) techniques.
methodsWe conducted an extensive retrospective analysis on a cohort of 171 breast cancer patients, differentiating them into 124 invasive and 47 non-invasive cases. The data was meticulously divided into a training set (n = 119) and a validation set (n = 52), maintaining a 70:30 ratio. Several machine learning models were developed and tested, including Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Decision Tree (DT), and Support Vector Machine (SVM). Their performance was evaluated using the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve (AUC), and visualized the feature contributions of the optimal model using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP).
resultsThrough both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, we identified key independent predictors in differentiating between invasive and non-invasive breast cancer types: coronal plane features, Shear Wave Velocity (SWV), and Radscore. The AUC scores for our machine learning models varied, ranging from 0.625 to 0.880, with the DT model demonstrating a notably high AUC of 0.874 in the validation set.
conclusionOur findings indicate that machine learning models, which integrate ABVS radiomics and VTQ, are significantly effective in preoperatively distinguishing between invasive and non-invasive breast cancer. Particularly, the DT model stood out in the validation set, establishing it as the primary model in our study. This highlights its potential utility in enhancing clinical decision-making processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.