Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39406956›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

The individual and ecological characteristics of parental COVID-19 vaccination decisions.

Lukas Hörnig, Sandra Schaffner, Hendrik Schmitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lukas HörnigRWI - Leibniz-Institute for Economic Research, Essen, Germany. lukas.hoernig@rwi-essen.de.ORCID 0000-0003-1754-2239
Sandra SchaffnerRWI - Leibniz-Institute for Economic Research, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4941-4058
Hendrik SchmitzRWI - Leibniz-Institute for Economic Research, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0253-102X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination is a highly effective method to prevent the spread of COVID-19 and mitigate severe disease. In Germany, adult vaccination rates are relatively high at 85.5%, but rates are significantly lower for adolescents (69.6%) and children (20.0%). This discrepancy indicates that not all vaccinated parents choose to vaccinate their children. Analyzing data from a January 2022 online survey of 1,819 parents with children and adolescents, we explore the socio-economic factors influencing parents' willingness to vaccinate themselves and their children. Our results show that individuals who vote for either side of the political extremes are less likely to vaccinate their children. This pattern is particularly strong for voters on the far right. In addition, we find that better educated parents are more likely to vaccinate both themselves and their children. Parents who vaccinate both themselves and their children demonstrate greater confidence in the vaccine's effectiveness, while those who vaccinate only themselves are often motivated by a desire to regain personal freedoms. These insights highlight the need for targeted public health strategies to address specific concerns and improve vaccination rates among children and adolescents.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesParentsVaccinationAdolescentAdultChildDecision MakingFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Socioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19 VaccinesAdolescentsChildrenCOVID-19 vaccinationParentsVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID39406956
PMCPMC11480482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.