Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39406952›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2025

The who, when, and why of pacifier use.

Kaloyan Mitev, Kelsey L Frewin, Maria Augustinova, Paula M Niedenthal, Magdalena Rychlowska, Ross E Vanderwert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kaloyan MitevDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, England, United Kingdom.
Kelsey L FrewinSchool of Psychology, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England, United Kingdom.
Maria AugustinovaCentre de Recherche sur les Fonctionnements et les Dysfonctionnements Psychologiques (CRFDP, UR 7475), Université de Rouen Normandie, Rouen, France.
Paula M NiedenthalDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Magdalena Rychlowska *School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom. M.Rychlowska@qub.ac.uk.
Ross E Vanderwert *Cardiff University Centre for Human Developmental Science (CUCHDS), Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom.

Funding

British Academy/Leverhulme Small Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial and familial consequences of pacifier use remain poorly understood. The present study attempts to shed more light on the characteristics of parents using pacifiers with their infants and to explore how pacifier use affects perceptions of infant emotionality, maternal stress, and parental efficacy.

methodsThe study sample consisted of 428 mothers (range: 17-49 years) of infants (0-36 months) who completed a comprehensive questionnaire assessing infant and parent characteristics as well as parenting practices and pacifier use. We compared attitudes toward pacifiers, parenting stress, children's levels of reactivity and self-regulation, and maternal efficacy among Pacifier Users, Never-Users, and families that Tried-Pacifiers.

resultsThe reported results reveal benefits of pacifier use for the family relationships, namely reduced parenting stress (p = 0.018), better parent-child dynamics (p < 0.001), and more positive perceptions of child's affectivity (p = 0.006), which are all important aspects of infant development.

conclusionOur findings highlight developmental benefits of pacifier use, a practice that is known to have both positive and negative long-term consequences for healthy child development. It is, therefore, important for health professionals to have discussions about the pros and cons of pacifier use with parents. IMPACT: The study provides novel insights into how and why mothers use pacifiers and into the psychological consequences of this practice. We found pacifier use is associated with less maternal stress, better mother-child dynamics, and more positive perceptions of child's affectivity. Our findings document developmental benefits of pacifier use adding a new perspective to the debate on pacifiers. Doctors, health visitors, pediatric nurses, and midwives may consider this evidence when advising parents on pacifier use.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentMothersPacifiersAdolescentAdultChild, PreschoolEmotionsFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedMother-Child RelationsParentingStress, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID39406952
PMCPMC12279544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.