ArticleScientific reports2024
Image segmentation for pest detection of crop leaves by improvement of regional convolutional neural network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- CFAEVM-UNet: cross-fusion attention enhanced VM-UNet for UAV image segmentation of small and dense field crop pests.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- High-performance parallel multi-scale attention network with explainable AI for intelligent diagnosis of leaf diseases in agricultural systems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Tree-Guided Transformer for Sensor-Based Ecological Image Feature Extraction and Multitarget Recognition in Agricultural Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of sandstone microtomographic image segmentation using advanced convolutional neural networks with pixelwise and physical accuracy evaluation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pest detection is important for crop cultivation. Crop leaf is the main place of pest invasion. Current technologies to detect crop pests have constraints, such as low efficiency, storage demands and limited precision. Image segmentation is a fast and efficient computer-aided detection technology. High resolution image capture solidly supports the crucial processes in discerning pests from images. Study of analytical methods help parse information in the images. In this paper, a regional convolutional neural network (R-CNN) architecture is designed in combination with the radial bisymmetric divergence (RBD) method for enhancing the efficiency of image segmentation. As a special application of RBD, the hierarchical mask (HM) is produced to endorse detection and classification of the leaf-dwelling pests, offering enhanced efficiency and reduced storage requirements. Moreover, to deal with some mislabeled data, a threshold variable is introduced to adjust a fault-tolerant mechanism into HM, to generate a novel threshold-based hierarchical mask (TbHM). Consequently, the hierarchical mask R-CNN (HM-R-CNN) model and the threshold-based hierarchical mask R-CNN (TbHM-R-CNN) model are established to detect various types of healthy and pest-invasive crop leaves to select the regional image features that are rich in pest information. Then simple linear iterative clustering (SLIC) method is incorporation to finish the image segmentation for the classification of pest invasion. The models are tuned and optimized, then validated. The most optimized modeling results are from the TbHM-R-CNN model, with the classification accuracy of 96.2%, the recall of 97.5% and the F1 score of 0.982. Additionally, the HM-R-CNN model observed appreciable results second only to the best model. These results indicate that the proposed methodologies are well-suited for training and testing a dataset of plant diseases, offering heightened accuracy in pest classification. This study revealed that the proposed methods significantly outperform the existing techniques, marking a substantial improvement over current methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.