Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39406872›Full record

SynthesisCardiovascular and interventional radiology2024

Percutaneous Cryoablation in the Liver: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Safety with a Focus on Incidence of Cryoshock and Major Complications.

Johannes Kolck, Daniel Schulze, Michael Brönnimann, Matthias Fürstner, Uli Fehrenbach, Federico Collettini, Bernhard Gebauer, Timo A Auer

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The Role of IR in Pediatric Liver Cancer.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Johannes KolckDepartment of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Virchow (CVK), Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Daniel SchulzeInstitute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Michael BrönnimannDepartment of Diagnostic, Interventional and Paediatric Radiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Matthias FürstnerDepartment of Radiology, Klinikum Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Austria.
Uli FehrenbachDepartment of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Virchow (CVK), Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Federico CollettiniDepartment of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Virchow (CVK), Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Bernhard GebauerDepartment of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Virchow (CVK), Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Timo A AuerDepartment of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Virchow (CVK), Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany. timo-alexander.auer@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5763-689X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of the present meta-analysis was to systematically determine the overall complication rate and incidence of cryoshock in patients undergoing cryoablation of the liver.

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis adhering to the PRISMA guidelines and focusing on studies of cryotherapy for liver malignancies published after 2000 were conducted. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus were systematically searched for articles reporting incidences of adverse events associated with percutaneous cryoablation in patients with liver malignancies. Data extraction and screening were independently conducted by two reviewers, who resolved discrepancies through consensus. Statistical analysis was performed to assess heterogeneity and pooled complication rates and included a moderator analysis to explore factors influencing the occurrence of complications.

resultsThe initial search yielded 4,145 articles, of which 26 met our inclusion criteria. From these 26 articles, pooled data on 4,029 patients were extracted. Variance between studies reporting cryoshock was low (I

conclusionAnalysis of currently available evidence indicates that cryoablation has a relative safe profile with a pooled incidence of major complications below 5%. Cryoshock occurred in less than 0.3% of procedures and was not reported for liver lesions smaller than 3 cm.

Indexed as

CryosurgeryLiver NeoplasmsPostoperative ComplicationsHumansIncidenceLiverCryoshockLiver cryoablationLiver malignanciesLocal treatment

Identifiers

PMID39406872
PMCPMC11541357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.