ArticleScientific reports2024
Lessons learned from 12 years using the Woven Endobridge for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms in a multi-center series.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hemodynamic Impact of Morphological Changes in Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with the Contour Neurovascular System: A Pilot In Silico Study.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Rare delayed thromboembolic complication 18 days after Woven EndoBridge implantation: A case report.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
- Microsurgical clipping for coil-extruded recurrent aneurysms: Case series and technical pearls.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
- Mechanisms of Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture: An Integrative Review of Experimental and Clinical Evidence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intrasaccular flow disruption with the Woven Endobridge (WEB) has become a well-established endovascular technique for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. This study presents our 12-year experience with the WEB and evaluates its evolving indications, procedures, and outcomes. A consecutive series of 324 aneurysms treated with WEB between 2011 and 2023 at three neurovascular centers was retrospectively analyzed and the study group was divided into four treatment periods. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate factors associated with technical success, thromboembolic complications, and angiographic outcome. The mean aneurysm size was 7.0 ± 3.6 mm and decreased during the study period, while the proportion of atypical sites for WEB implantation increased. WEB implantation was technically successful in 96.0%, and the ratio of WEB width to dome width increased during the study period, indicating oversizing. The neurological complication rate was 4.9% (1.5% major, 3.4% minor) and the mid-term complete occlusion rate was 60.6% (81.9% adequate occlusion), with no statistical differences in either outcome measure between the study periods. In multivariate analyses, the use of WEB 17 was associated with increased technical success (HR: 7.4, 95%CI: 2.4-23.6, p<0.01), whereas ruptured aneurysm status (HR: 2.5, 95%CI: 1.0-6.0, p=0.04) and the use of additional stents (HR: 4.8, 95%CI: 1.6-14.4, p<0.01) predicted thromboembolic complications. Appropriate oversizing of the WEB favored mid-term complete occlusion (HR: 10.5, 95%CI: 1.3-83.3, p=0.03). The results suggest an expansion of the indications for WEB implantation and highlight the importance of oversizing for treatment efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.