Precision comparison of intensity ratios and area ratios in spectral analysis.

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

Precision in Peak Parameter Estimation for the Pseudo-Voigt Profile: A Novel Optimization Approach for High-Precision Analysis via Mixing Parameter Control.ACS measurement science au · 2025
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuuki HagiwaraResearch Institute for Marine Geodynamics, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokosuka, 237-0061, Japan. hagiwaray@jamstec.go.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5515-0407

Tatsu KuwataniResearch Institute for Marine Geodynamics, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokosuka, 237-0061, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7161-9458

Funding

Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo ERI JURP 2024-B-01Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows JP19J21537JSPS Fellows JP22J00081JST CREST JPMJCR1761

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The long-debated question in analytical chemistry of which of the area ratio or the intensity ratio is the more precise has yielded no definitive analytical conclusion. To address this issue theoretically, we derived analytical solutions for the lower limits of estimation precision for spectral parameters, including the intensity ratio and area ratio, based on the Cramér-Rao lower bound (CRLB) framework for a Gaussian spectrum. The precisions of spectral parameter estimations from the analytical solutions were consistent with results obtained from Monte Carlo simulations. Our theoretical and simulation results revealed that the precision of estimating the area ratio surpassed that of the intensity ratio by a factor of

Indexed as

Area ratioCramér–Rao lower boundFisher informationIntensity ratioMonte Carlo simulationVariance–covariance matrix

Identifiers

PMID39406767

DOI10.1038/s41598-024-71653-3

PMCPMC11480322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.