Observational studyScientific reports2024
Outcomes of a 3-day transparent film dressing protocol after hypospadias repair.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate a 3-day transparent film dressing protocol after hypospadias repair. A retrospective observational study was conducted in boys with hypospadias who were operated in our institution between 2022 and 2023. Postoperatively, the penis was wrapped with a transparent film dressing, which was removed after 3 days. Postoperative complications were observed until postoperative day 14. The associations of age, meatal location, and type of procedure were analyzed using Chi square, Fisher exact, Mann Whitney, and Kruskall Wallis test (p < 0.05 = significant). Sixty-five patients were studied. Median age was five years, the majority had proximal meatus (58.5%), and underwent urethroplasty (76.9%). After dressing removal, positive bacterial culture was found in 43.1%, mild penile edema in 33.8%, bleeding in 10.8%, and SSI in 49.2% of cases, with pus formation (10.8%), dehiscence (9.2%), and urethrocutaneous fistula (10% after urethroplasty procedure). Surgical site infection and positive culture were significantly higher in patients with proximal meatus compared to distal (p = 0.031, p = 0.019; respectively). A 3-day transparent film dressing prevented penile edema and bleeding in most cases. However, the rate of SSI and positive wound culture was high, and was associated with proximal meatal location.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.