Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39406742›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

The importance of including both sexes in preclinical sleep studies and analyses.

Grant S Mannino, Tabitha R F Green, Sean M Murphy, Kevin D Donohue, Mark R Opp, Rachel K Rowe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. A Subcircuit in the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus Generates Wakefulness.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  19. Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Grant S ManninoDepartment of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado - Boulder, 2860 Wilderness Place, Boulder, CO, 80301, USA.
Tabitha R F GreenDepartment of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado - Boulder, 2860 Wilderness Place, Boulder, CO, 80301, USA.
Sean M MurphyCumberland Biological and Ecological Researchers, Longmont, CO, USA.
Kevin D DonohueDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Mark R OppDepartment of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado - Boulder, 2860 Wilderness Place, Boulder, CO, 80301, USA.
Rachel K RoweDepartment of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado - Boulder, 2860 Wilderness Place, Boulder, CO, 80301, USA. Rachel.rowe@colorado.edu.

Funding

Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs PR211450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A significant effort in biomedical sciences has been made to examine relationships between sex and the mechanisms underlying various disease states and behaviors, including sleep. Here, we investigated biological sex differences in sleep using male and female C57BL/6J mice (n = 267). Physiological parameters were recorded for 48-h using non-invasive piezoelectric cages to determine total sleep, non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep, rapid eye movement (REM)-like sleep, and wakefulness (WAKE). We fit hierarchical generalized linear mixed models with nonlinear time effects and found substantial sex differences in sleep. Female mice slept less overall, with less NREM sleep compared to males. Females also exhibited more REM-like sleep and WAKE and had shorter NREM sleep bout lengths. We also conducted a simulation exercise where we simulated a hypothetical treatment that altered the sleep of female mice, but not male mice. In models that included an appropriate sex by treatment interaction, a female-specific treatment response was accurately estimated when sample sizes were equal but was not detected when sample sizes were unequal, and females were underrepresented. Failure to include both sexes in experimental designs or appropriately account for sex during analysis could lead to inaccurate translational recommendations in pre-clinical sleep studies.

Indexed as

Mice, Inbred C57BLSleepWakefulnessAnimalsFemaleMaleMiceSex CharacteristicsSex FactorsSleep, REMFemaleMaleMouseNon-invasiveSex differencesSleep

Identifiers

PMID39406742
PMCPMC11480430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.