ArticleNature communications2024
High sensitivity cameras can lower spatial resolution in high-resolution optical microscopy.
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Insights Into Spatial Transcriptomics: Exploring Recent Technical Developments and Their Diverse Applications.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026Review
- Application of gradient-consensus Richardson-Lucy deconvolution to noisy undersampled brightfield microscopy data.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Convergence of Multidimensional Sensing: A Review of AI-Enhanced Space-Division Multiplexing in Optical Fiber Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-resolution optical fluorescence microscopies and, in particular, super-resolution fluorescence microscopy, are rapidly adopting highly sensitive cameras as their preferred photodetectors. Camera-based parallel detection facilitates high-speed live cell imaging with the highest spatial resolution. Here, we show that the drive to use ever more sensitive, photon-counting image sensors in cameras can, however, have detrimental effects on the spatial resolution of the resulting images. This is particularly noticeable in applications that demand a high space-bandwidth product, where the image magnification is close to the Nyquist sampling limit of the sensor. Most scientists will often select image sensors based on parameters such as pixel size, quantum efficiency, signal-to-noise performance, dynamic range, and frame rate of the sensor. A parameter that is, however, typically overlooked is the sensor's modulation transfer function (MTF). We have determined the wavelength-specific MTF of front- and back-illuminated image sensors and evaluated how it affects the spatial resolution that can be achieved in high-resolution fluorescence microscopy modalities. We find significant differences in image sensor performance that cause the resulting spatial resolution to vary by up to 28%. This result shows that the choice of image sensor has a significant impact on the imaging performance of all camera-based optical microscopy modalities.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.