ArticleGenome research2024
Telomere-to-telomere assembly by preserving contained reads.
Article in Genome research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic structural variation rescues a classic biological invader from a population bottleneck.Science advances · 2026Article
- A Complete Telomere-To-Telomere Assembly ofEvolutionary applications · 2026Article
- Article
- MGA: a tool for haplotype-mixed assembly of long and accurate reads.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Haplotype-Resolved Genome Assemblies for Norwegian Red Cattle.Animal genetics · 2026Article
- The tiger who came to T2T: Telomere-to-Telomere genome assembly of the Sumatran tiger (Panthera tigris sumatrae) using nanopore simplex reads.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- High-quality draft genome sequence of the tropical lichen-forming fungusMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025Article
- Evaluating data requirements for high-quality haplotype-resolved genomes for creating robust pangenome references.Genome biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Automated telomere-to-telomere (T2T) de novo assembly of diploid and polyploid genomes remains a formidable task. A string graph is a commonly used assembly graph representation in the assembly algorithms. The string graph formulation employs graph simplification heuristics, which drastically reduce the count of vertices and edges. One of these heuristics involves removing the reads contained in longer reads. In practice, this heuristic occasionally introduces gaps in the assembly by removing all reads that cover one or more genome intervals. The factors contributing to such gaps remain poorly understood. In this work, we mathematically derived the frequency of observing a gap near a germline and a somatic heterozygous variant locus. Our analysis shows that (1) an assembly gap due to contained read deletion is an order of magnitude more frequent in Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) reads than Pacific Biosciences high-fidelity (PacBio HiFi) reads due to differences in their read-length distributions, and (2) this frequency decreases with an increase in the sequencing depth. Drawing cues from these observations, we addressed the weakness of the string graph formulation by developing the repeat-aware fragmenting tool (RAFT) assembly algorithm. RAFT addresses the issue of contained reads by fragmenting reads and producing a more uniform read-length distribution. The algorithm retains spanned repeats in the reads during the fragmentation. We empirically demonstrate that RAFT significantly reduces the number of gaps using simulated data sets. Using real ONT and PacBio HiFi data sets of the HG002 human genome, we achieved a twofold increase in the contig NG50 and the number of haplotype-resolved T2T contigs compared to hifiasm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.