Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39406349›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2024

Mice employ a bait-and-switch escape mechanism to de-escalate social conflict.

Rachel S Clein, Megan R Warren, Joshua P Neunuebel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rachel S CleinDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States of America.
Megan R WarrenDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States of America.
Joshua P NeunuebelDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4894-4364

Funding

Updated confocal microscope in the Imaging Core facility to support biomedical researchP20GM103653 · NIGMS · DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HARRINGTON, MELISSA A · 2012 to 2022
$22.7M
Neural Encoding of Social InformationR01MH122752 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI NEUNUEBEL, JOSHUA P · 2020 to 2024
$3.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103653NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH122752
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraspecies aggression has profound ecological and evolutionary consequences, as recipients can suffer injuries, decreases in fitness, and become outcasts from social groups. Although animals implement diverse strategies to avoid hostile confrontations, the extent to which social influences affect escape tactics is unclear. Here, we used computational and machine-learning approaches to analyze complex behavioral interactions as mixed-sex groups of mice, Mus musculus, freely interacted. Mice displayed a rich repertoire of behaviors marked by changes in behavioral state, aggressive encounters, and mixed-sex interactions. A distinctive behavioral sequence consistently occurred after aggressive encounters, where males in submissive states quickly approached and transiently interacted with females immediately before the aggressor engaged with the same female. The behavioral sequences were also associated with substantially fewer physical altercations. Furthermore, the male's behavioral state could be predicted by distinct features of the behavioral sequence, such as kinematics and the latency to and duration of male-female interactions. More broadly, our work revealed an ethologically relevant escape strategy influenced by the presence of females that may serve as a mechanism for de-escalating social conflict and preventing consequential reductions in fitness.

Indexed as

AggressionBehavior, AnimalAnimalsConflict, PsychologicalEscape ReactionFemaleMachine LearningMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLSocial Behavior

Identifiers

PMID39406349
PMCPMC11479765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.