ArticleNeurointervention2024
Efficacy of Endovascular Glue Embolization in Treating Ruptured Intracranial Mycotic Aneurysms: A Single Center Experience.
Article in Neurointervention, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Complex Anatomy, Advanced Techniques: Microsurgical Clipping of a Ruptured Hypophyseal Artery Aneurysm.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIntracranial mycotic aneurysms (IMAs), rare and often life-threatening, result from arterial wall infections typically caused by bacteria such as Staphylococcus and Streptococcus. The standard treatment for ruptured aneurysms is not well-defined and often individualized. This study investigates the efficacy of endovascular glue embolization in managing ruptured IMAs, based on our center's experience. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted for ruptured IMAs treated with glue embolization between January 2016 and December 2023. The procedure involved aneurysm sac and parent vessel occlusion with glue delivery. Data included patient demographics, clinical presentations, and neuroimaging. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 3 months, and angiographic follow-up was conducted at 6 months.
resultsThe study included 28 patients, predominantly male (64.3%), with a mean age of 48 years. Headache was the primary symptom in 92.9% of cases, and positive blood/cerebro spinal fluid cultures were found in 82.14% of cases. All aneurysms were located in the distal circulation, primarily in the anterior circulation system. Glue embolization was successfully performed in all cases, achieving complete aneurysm sac and parent vessel obliteration. Follow-up at 3 months indicated mRS scores of 0 or 1 in 96.5% of cases. Six-month angiographic follow-up showed no aneurysm regrowth or new formations.
conclusionEndovascular glue embolization demonstrated high efficacy and safety in treating ruptured IMAs, with a 100% obliteration rate and favorable clinical outcomes in this single-center experience. Despite limitations such as its retrospective design and small sample size, the study supports glue embolization as a viable, less invasive alternative to traditional surgery. Further comparative studies are needed to confirm these findings and refine treatment approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.