ArticleJournal of chromatography. A2024
Highly selective split intein method for efficient separation and purification of recombinant therapeutic proteins from mammalian cell culture fluid.
Article in Journal of chromatography. A, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Production and Purification of Therapeutic Antibodies: A Comprehensive Analysis of Process- and Product-Related Contaminants.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Characterization of Human Recombinant β1,4-GalNAc-Transferase B4GALNT1 and Inhibition by Selected Compounds.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Novel Self-Cleaving Affinity Purification Method for Cellular Membrane-Associated Recombinant Paraoxonase-1 (rePON1) Enzyme.The protein journal · 2025Article
- A Unique THN Motif Is Critical for Enabling Efficient C-Terminal Traceless Cleavage.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Conditional Split Inteins: Adaptable Tools for Programming Protein Functions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biologics and vaccines have been successfully developed over the last few decades to treat many diseases. Each of these drugs must be highly purified for clinical use. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), the dominant therapeutic modality on the market, can be easily purified using the standard Protein A affinity platform. However, no generally applicable affinity platforms are available for the manufacture of other therapeutic proteins for clinical use. Thus, multicolumn chromatography processes for widely being used for product purification. These processes demand significant optimization to meet desired product quality attributes, where each step also decreases final yields. In this work, we demonstrate the novel self-removing iCapTag™ affinity tag, which provides a new platform for capturing, concentrating, and purifying recombinant proteins. Importantly, this system provides a tagless target protein, which is suitable for research and clinical use, where the only requirement for tag removal is a small change in buffer pH. No additional proteins, reagents or cofactors are required. We also present case studies demonstrating the use of iCapTag™ for highly efficient purification of untagged interferon alpha 2b, the ML39 single chain variable fragment (scFv), and the receptor binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. These proteins were expressed and secreted by Expi293 cells with the self-removing tag fused to their N-terminus. We were able to obtain highly pure (> 99 %) tagless protein in a single purification step with high clearance of host cell DNA, tagged precursor, higher and lower molecular weight impurities. Based on these preliminary results, we propose the iCapTag™ as a universal capture platform for diverse classes of recombinant therapeutic proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.