Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39405469›Full record

ArticleACS nano2024

Robust and Sustained STING Pathway Activation via Hydrogel-Based In Situ Vaccination for Cancer Immunotherapy.

Sheng-Liang Cheng, Hsin-Mei Lee, Chung-Pin Li, Mei-Wei Lin, Min-Yuan Chou, Yu-Ting Yen, Tun-Han Wu, Yun-Chen Lian, Yu-Chuan Shih, Chi-Shiun Chiang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS nano, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. ROS-Responsive MnOJournal of nanobiotechnology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sheng-Liang ChengInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan.
Hsin-Mei LeeInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan.
Chung-Pin LiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan.
Mei-Wei LinBiomedical Technology and Device Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu 310401, Taiwan.
Min-Yuan ChouBiomedical Technology and Device Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu 310401, Taiwan.
Yu-Ting YenInstitute of Translational Medicine and New Drug Development, School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 406040, Taiwan.
Tun-Han WuInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan.
Yun-Chen LianInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan.
Yu-Chuan ShihInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan.
Chi-Shiun ChiangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Sciences, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan.
Ting-Wen ChenInstitute of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30068, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4028-2375
Dehui WanInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-5255-1731
Yunching ChenInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-6228-5169

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway is crucial for tumor immunity, leading to the exploration of STING agonists as potential immunotherapy adjuvants. However, their clinical application faces obstacles including poor pharmacokinetics, transient activation, and an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Addressing these limitations, our study aims to develop an injectable silk fibroin hydrogel-based in situ vaccine. It incorporates a nanoscale STING agonist, an immunogenic cell death (ICD) inducer, and an immunomodulator to ensure their controlled and sustained release. cGAMP nanoparticles (cGAMPnps) with a core-shell structure ensure optimal delivery of cGAMP to dendritic cells (DCs), thereby activating the STING pathway and fostering DC maturation. ICD-associated damage-associated molecular patterns amplify and prolong STING activation via enhanced type I IFN and other inflammatory pathways, along with delayed degradation of cGAMP and STING. Furthermore, the STING-driven vascular normalization by cGAMPnps and ICD, in conjunction with immunomodulators like antiprogrammed cell death protein 1 antibody (anti-PD-1 Ab) or OX40 ligand (OX40L), effectively remodels the immunosuppressive TME. This in situ gel vaccine, when used independently or with surgery as neoadjuvant/adjuvant immunotherapy, enhances DC and CD8

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesHydrogelsImmunotherapyMembrane ProteinsNucleotides, CyclicAnimalsDendritic CellsHumansMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNanoparticlesNeoplasmsSTING ProteinTumor MicroenvironmentVaccinationCancer Vaccinescyclic guanosine monophosphate-adenosine monophosphateHydrogelsMembrane ProteinsNucleotides, CyclicSTING1 protein, humanSting1 protein, mouseSTING Proteincancer immunotherapycGAMPimmunogenic cell deathnanoparticleneoadjuvant immunotherapysilk fibroin hydrogelSTING agonist

Identifiers

PMID39405469
PMCPMC11526424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.