ArticleRadiation research2024
Effect of Ultrahigh Dose Rate on Biomolecular Radiation Damage.
Article in Radiation research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultra-high dose rate dependent modeling of plasmid DNA damage with TOPAS-nBio.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Article
- Microenvironmental remodeling in FLASH radiotherapy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Cytogenetic Effects of Conventional and Ultra High Dose Rates of Radiation in Human Lymphocytes: Comparative Analysis in Metaphase Chromosomes and G2-PCCs.Disaster medicine and public health preparedness · 2025Article
- Investigating radical yield variations in FLASH and conventional proton irradiation via microscopic Monte Carlo simulations.Physics in medicine and biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dose rate is one of the important parameters in radiation-induced biomolecular damage. The effects of dose rate have been known to modify radiation toxicity in biological systems. The rate and extent of sublethal DNA damage (e.g., base damage and single-strand breaks) repair and those of cell proliferation have been manifested by dose rate. However, the recent preclinical application of ultrahigh dose rate [(UHDR) ca. 40 Gy/s and higher] radiation modalities have been shown to lower the type and extent of radiation damage to biological systems. At these UHDR, radiation-induced physicochemical and chemical processes are expected to differ from those observed after irradiation at conventional dose rates (CONV). It is unclear whether these UHDR conditions can affect the quality (type) and quantity (extent) of biomolecular damage such as DNA lesions. Here, we comparatively study the influence of indirect effects of CONV and UHDR on the formation of DNA strand breaks and clustered damage including densely accumulated lesions in an aerated and an anoxic dilute aqueous solution of a plasmid DNA model under low and high hydroxyl radical (•OH) scavenging conditions. Aqueous solutions of purified supercoiled plasmid DNA (pUC19) were prepared in either air- or nitrogen-saturated conditions, with Tris buffer added as the radiation-produced •OH scavenger at low and high scavenging capacities. These DNA samples were irradiated using kV X-ray systems at CONV (0.1 Gy/s) and high dose rate (HDR, 25 Gy/s) as well as UHDR (55 and 125 Gy/s) under different scavenging and environmental conditions. DNA lesions including strand breaks and clustered damage including densely accumulated lesions were quantified by gel electrophoresis and the yields of these lesions were calculated from the dose-response curve. Non-DSB clustered damage including densely accumulated lesions were evaluated by treating DNAs using bacterial endonuclease enzymes (Fpg and Nth) prior to gel electrophoresis. UHDR of 55 and 125 Gy/s induced lower amounts of both isolated strand breaks and clustered DNA damage including densely accumulated lesions at doses >40 Gy in the presence of oxygen, compared to the abundance of these lesions induced by 0.1 and 25 Gy/s irradiation under the same dose conditions. Overall, the strand break and clustered damage including densely accumulated lesions yields decreased by factors of 1.3-3.5 after UHDR. We did not observe these differences either via •OH scavenging or by removing oxygen from the solution. In addition, our results point out that the inter-track recombination reactions did not contribute to the observed dose-rate effects on DNA damage. The effects of dose rate on DNA damage are highly dependent on the total dose, as expected, but also on the •OH scavenging capacity that is employed in the aqueous DNA solutions. These important variables may be relevant in biological systems as well. On a practical level, our in vitro plasmid DNA model, which permits to precisely vary the •OH scavenging capacity and gassing conditions (air saturated vs. N2 saturated) can help to differentiate dose-rate effects on biomolecular damage. Our results indicate that the radical-radical reactions are important in understanding the dose-rate effect on DNA damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.