Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39405443›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2024

Remdesivir-Associated Survival Outcomes Among Immunocompromised Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: Real-world Evidence From the Omicron-Dominant Era.

Essy Mozaffari, Aastha Chandak, Robert L Gottlieb, Chidinma Chima-Melton, Mark Berry, Alpesh N Amin, Paul E Sax, Andre C Kalil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Is early combination therapy associated with lower risk of respiratory failure in severely immunocompromised hosts with COVID-19? a target trial emulation study from the omicron-dominant era.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Real-world effectiveness of early remdesivir in reducing mortality among vulnerable patients hospitalized for COVID-19: Evidence for clinical pharmacists and inpatient care providers.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2026
    Article
  5. Evaluating treatment effectiveness: Complementing RCTs with real-world data.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Real-world effectiveness of remdesivir in immunocompromised patients hospitalized due to SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Insights to inform pharmacy practice.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2026
    Article
  8. Management of patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 infection: A real-world economic evaluation from the hospital perspective.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Remdesivir for Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19: Evidence of Effectiveness From Cohort Studies in the Omicron Era.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
  19. Public Health Benefits of Applying Evidence-Based Best Practices in Managing Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Essy MozaffariMedical Affairs, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California, USA.
Aastha ChandakEvidence and Access, Certara, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5653-435X
Robert L GottliebDepartment of Internal Medicine, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8376-8709
Chidinma Chima-MeltonPulmonary Division, Tele-ICU, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0730-9871
Mark BerryMedical Affairs, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8534-2012
Alpesh N AminDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9790-0245
Paul E SaxDivision of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8434-174X
Andre C KalilDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6489-6294

Funding

Gilead Sciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with immunocompromising conditions are at increased risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related hospitalizations and deaths. Randomized clinical trials provide limited enrollment, if any, to provide information on the outcomes in such patients treated with remdesivir.

methodsUsing the US PINC AI Healthcare Database, we identified adult patients with immunocompromising conditions, hospitalized for COVID-19 between December 2021 and February 2024. The primary outcome was all-cause inpatient mortality examined in propensity score-matched patients in remdesivir vs nonremdesivir groups. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with cancer, hematological malignancies, and solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

resultsOf 28 966 patients included in the study, 16 730 (58%) received remdesivir during the first 2 days of hospitalization. After propensity score matching, 8822 patients in the remdesivir and 8822 patients in the nonremdesivir group were analyzed. Remdesivir was associated with a significantly lower mortality rate among patients with no supplemental oxygen (adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.73 [.62-.86] at 14 days and 0.79 [.68-.91] at 28 days) and among those with supplemental oxygen (0.75 [.67-.85] and 0.78 [.70-.86], respectively). Remdesivir was also associated with lower mortality rates in subgroups of patients with cancer, hematological malignancies (leukemia, lymphoma, or multiple myeloma), and solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplants.

conclusionsIn this large cohort of patients with immunocompromising conditions hospitalized for COVID-19, remdesivir was associated with significant improvement in survival, including patients with varied underlying immunocompromising conditions. The integration of current real-world evidence into clinical guideline recommendations can inform clinical communities to optimize treatment decisions in the evolving COVID-19 era, extending beyond the conclusion of the public health emergency declaration.

Indexed as

Adenosine MonophosphateAlanineAntiviral AgentsCOVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentHospitalizationImmunocompromised HostSARS-CoV-2AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreAdenosine MonophosphateAlanineAntiviral AgentsremdesivircancercomorbidityCOVID-19data sciencehematological malignancyimmunocompromisedleukemialymphomamultiple myelomaomicronpropensity scorereal-world dataremdesivirSARS-CoV-2transplantation

Identifiers

PMID39405443
PMCPMC11638779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.