Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39405124›Full record

ArticleJCI insight2024

More women than ever are entering MD-PhD programs. What lies ahead for them?

Lawrence F Brass, Myles H Akabas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCI insight, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lawrence F BrassUniversity of Pennsylvania Medical Scientist Training Program, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Myles H AkabasAlbert Einstein College of Medicine Medical Scientist Training Program, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM148377 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Michael Lee Atchison, LAWRENCE F BRASS · 2023 to 2026
$12.0M
Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM149364 · NIGMS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Myles H. Akabas · 2023 to 2026
$7.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM148377NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM149364
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The earliest MD-PhD programs were small and enrolled mostly men. Here, we show that since 2014 there has been a steady increase in the number of women in MD-PhD programs, the number of women reaching parity with men in 2023. This change was due to an increase in female applicants, a decrease in male applicants, and an increase in the acceptance rate for women, which had previously been lower than that for men. Data from the National MD-PhD Program Outcomes Study show that training duration has been similar for men and women, as have most choices of medical specialties and workplaces. However, women were less likely to have full-time faculty appointments, fewer had NIH grants, and those in the most recent graduation cohort at the time of the survey reported spending less time on research than men. Previously cited reasons for these differences include disproportionate childcare responsibilities, a paucity of role models, insufficient recognition, and gender bias. Institutions can and should address these obstacles, but training programs can help by preparing their graduates to succeed despite the systemic obstacles. The alternative is a persistent gender gap in the physician-scientist workforce, lost opportunities to benefit from diverse perspectives, and a diminished impact of valuable training resources.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceBiomedical ResearchFemaleHumansMalePhysicians, WomenResearch PersonnelSexismUnited StatesAdaptive immunityAging

Identifiers

PMID39405124
PMCPMC11601917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.