Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39405079›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2024

Perspectives of Children and Adolescents on Engaging With a Web-Based Mental Health Program: Focus Group Study.

Christopher Cahill, Jennifer Connolly, Shelley Appleton, Melanie Jade White

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher CahillSchool of Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, 149 Victoria Park Rd, Kelvin Grove, 4059, Australia, 61 7 3138 8970.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3057-4457
Jennifer ConnollySchool of Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, 149 Victoria Park Rd, Kelvin Grove, 4059, Australia, 61 7 3138 8970.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0585-5019
Shelley AppletonSchool of Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, 149 Victoria Park Rd, Kelvin Grove, 4059, Australia, 61 7 3138 8970.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4287-3411
Melanie Jade WhiteSchool of Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, 149 Victoria Park Rd, Kelvin Grove, 4059, Australia, 61 7 3138 8970.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4865-8878

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite accessibility and clinical benefits, open access trials of self-guided digital health interventions (DHIs) for young people have been plagued by high drop-out rates, with some DHIs recording completion rates of less than 3%. Objective: The aim of this study was to explore how young people motivate themselves to complete an unpleasant task and to explore perceived motivators and demotivators for engaging with a DHI. Methods: In this qualitative research study, 30 children and adolescents aged between 7 and 17 years were recruited to participate in 7 focus groups conducted over a 3-month period. Focus group activities and discussions explored sources of motivation to complete tasks and engage in a hypothetical 6-week DHI for anxiety. Results: Children (aged 7-11 years) reported greater reliance on external motivators such as following parent instruction to complete unpleasant tasks, while adolescents (aged 12-17 years) reported greater internal motivation such as self-discipline. Program factors, such as engaging content, were the most commonly mentioned motivators for engaging with a DHI across both age groups. After that, internal sources of motivation were most commonly mentioned, such as perceived future benefits. External factors were the most commonly mentioned demotivators across all ages, with time commitment being the most frequently mentioned. Conclusions: The study's findings have implications for enhancing adherence in future DHIs targeted to children and adolescents. Recommendations include the need for supportive parental involvement for children, while adolescents would likely benefit from mechanisms that promote autonomy, establish a supportive environment, and align with personal interests and values. Belief that a DHI will provide short-term benefits is important to both children and adolescents, as well as having confidence that future benefits will be realized.

Indexed as

adolescentschildrendemotivationdigital health interventionseHealthengagementexternal motivationinternal motivationinternet interventionsmental healthmotivationyouth

Identifiers

PMID39405079
PMCPMC11495236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.