ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024
Development and Validation of a Novel Night-Time Hazard Visibility Test.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Functional Impacts of Vision Impairment: Progress, Challenges and Future Directions.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Review
- Visual motion perception and driving hazard visibility at night-time.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Night-time driving is dangerous, with increased crash rates, particularly involving vulnerable road users. A Night-Time Hazard Visibility Test (NHVT) was developed and validated by exploring the effects of refractive and cataract blur on performance. Methods: The NHVT comprised video clips of night-time roads from the driver's perspective, including different hazards (pedestrians, cyclists, and vehicles). Participants responded when they first recognized hazards requiring them to take evasive action to avoid a collision. In experiment 1, there were 16 young visually normal drivers (mean age = 22.3, standard deviation [SD] = 2.2 years) who completed 2 NHVT sets, viewed separately through best-correction and refractive blur (+1.00 diopter sphere [DS]). In experiment 2, a refined version of the NHVT was administered to an additional 16 young visually normal drivers (mean age = 21.1, SD = 1.2 years) with best-correction and cataract blur. The order of visual conditions and NHVT sets were counterbalanced. Results: In experiment 1, refractive blur significantly reduced photopic visual acuity (VA) compared to best-corrected vision (+0.09 vs. -0.21 logMAR, P < 0.001) and delayed response times by 0.69 seconds (3.10 vs. 2.41 seconds, P < 0.001) compared to best-corrected vision. In experiment 2, cataract blur reduced VA compared to best-corrected vision (+0.03 vs. -0.17 logMAR, P < 0.001) and delayed response times by 0.63 seconds (2.92 vs. 2.29 seconds, P < 0.001). Conclusions: The NHVT was sensitive to refractive and cataract blur, providing preliminary support of its validity as a measure of night-time hazard visibility performance. Translational Relevance: The NHVT has potential as an off-road assessment of visibility for night driving and application for assessment of drivers with different refractive corrections and ocular diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.