ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024
Automated Identification of Clinically Relevant Regions in Glaucoma OCT Reports Using Expert Eye Tracking Data and Deep Learning.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Augmented Decisions: AI-Enhanced Accuracy in Glaucoma Diagnosis and Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Eye Tracking-Enhanced Deep Learning for Medical Image Analysis: A Systematic Review on Data Efficiency, Interpretability, and Multimodal Integration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advances in the application of artificial intelligence in ophthalmic education and clinical training.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To propose a deep learning-based approach for predicting the most-fixated regions on optical coherence tomography (OCT) reports using eye tracking data of ophthalmologists, assisting them in finding medically salient image regions. Methods: We collected eye tracking data of ophthalmology residents, fellows, and faculty as they viewed OCT reports to detect glaucoma. We used a U-Net model as the deep learning backbone and quantized eye tracking coordinates by dividing the input report into an 11 × 11 grid. The model was trained to predict the grids on which fixations would land in unseen OCT reports. We investigated the contribution of different variables, including the viewer's level of expertise, model architecture, and number of eye gaze patterns included in training. Results: Our approach predicted most-fixated regions in OCT reports with precision of 0.723, recall of 0.562, and f1-score of 0.609. We found that using a grid-based eye tracking structure enabled efficient training and using a U-Net backbone led to the best performance. Conclusions: Our approach has the potential to assist ophthalmologists in diagnosing glaucoma by predicting the most medically salient regions on OCT reports. Our study suggests the value of eye tracking in guiding deep learning algorithms toward informative regions when experts may not be accessible. Translational Relevance: By suggesting important OCT report regions for a glaucoma diagnosis, our model could aid in medical education and serve as a precursor for self-supervised deep learning approaches to expedite early detection of irreversible vision loss owing to glaucoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.