ReviewNeurotoxicity research2024
How is Excitotoxicity Being Modelled in iPSC-Derived Neurons?
Review in Neurotoxicity research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human iPSC-Derived Spinal Neurons Carrying the ALS FUS (P525L) Mutation Exhibit Lower Response to Inhibitory Neurotransmitters.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2026Article
- Advances and challenges in modeling Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 2A using iPSC-derived models.Stem cell reports · 2025Review
- An injectable 2.5% cross-linked polyacrylamide hydrogel (2.5 iPAAG) demonstrates no neurotoxicity in human induced pluripotent stem cells-derived iCellFrontiers in toxicology · 2025Article
- Non-hematopoietic erythropoietin splice variant is produced in the diseased human brain and confers neuroprotection.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Excitotoxicity linked either to environmental causes (pesticide and cyanotoxin exposure), excitatory neurotransmitter imbalance, or to intrinsic neuronal hyperexcitability, is a pathological mechanism central to neurodegeneration in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Investigation of excitotoxic mechanisms using in vitro and in vivo animal models has been central to understanding ALS mechanisms of disease. In particular, advances in induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technologies now provide human cell-based models that are readily amenable to environmental and network-based excitotoxic manipulations. The cell-type specific differentiation of iPSC, combined with approaches to modelling excitotoxicity that include editing of disease-associated gene variants, chemogenetics, and environmental risk-associated exposures make iPSC primed to examine gene-environment interactions and disease-associated excitotoxic mechanisms. Critical to this is knowledge of which neurotransmitter receptor subunits are expressed by iPSC-derived neuronal cultures being studied, how their activity responds to antagonists and agonists of these receptors, and how to interpret data derived from multi-parameter electrophysiological recordings. This review explores how iPSC-based studies have contributed to our understanding of ALS-linked excitotoxicity and highlights novel approaches to inducing excitotoxicity in iPSC-derived neurons to further our understanding of its pathological pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.