ReviewJournal of nephrology2025
New calcimimetics for secondary hyperparathyroidism in CKD G5D: do they offer advantages?
Review in Journal of nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pre-Parathyroidectomy PTH as an Integrated Biomarker of Glandular Remodeling and Skeletal Turnover in Secondary Hyperparathyroidism.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Association of serum magnesium levels and calcimimetic use: fractures and cardiovascular events in Japanese haemodialysis patients.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2026Article
- The effects of switching from etelcalcetide to upacicalcet in hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism.Clinical nephrology · 2025Article
- Calciphylaxis Following Parathyroidectomy in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients-Case Report and Literature Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Secondary hyperparathyroidism is one of the most frequent metabolic abnormalities found in patients with chronic kidney disease. The calcium-sensing receptor senses extracellular calcium and is the principal regulator of parathyroid hormone secretion. Cloning of the calcium-sensing receptor led to the development of calcimimetics, drugs that decrease parathyroid hormone secretion through the positive allosteric modulation of this receptor. Cinacalcet was the first oral calcimimetic approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2004 for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in adult patients on dialysis. Although cinacalcet has demonstrated safety and effectiveness, it has two main problems: gastrointestinal side effects that result in poor adherence, and the inhibitory action on CYP2D6 with the possibility of interactions with commonly used medications. To address the problem of oral compliance, Etelcalcetide, a small synthetic polycationic peptide IV calcimimetic was introduced in 2017. This drug showed a 10% greater decrease in serum parathyroid hormone values compared to cinacalcet but no better gastrointestinal tolerance, with greater risk of hypocalcemia. Several structural modifications were introduced in cinacalcet to produce a new compound called evocalcet. This drug, which was introduced in Japan in 2018, has considerably enhanced bioavailability and decreased both the inhibitory effect on CYP2D6 and half of the gastrointestinal side effects of cinacalcet. Finally, a novel non-peptidic injectable calcimimetic agent, upacicalcet, became available in Japan in 2021. This agent has greater clearance by hemodialysis and shows no effect on gastric emptying. More studies are needed comparing the old calcimimetics to the new ones to establish their future role in the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic kidney disease (CKD) G5D.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39404956What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.