Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39404939›Full record

ArticleChild psychiatry and human development2026

A Psychometric Evaluation of the Body Image Questionnaire Child and Adolescent Version.

L Blacker, M Gupta, R Quinn, B Monzani, A Jassi, D Veale, D Mataix-Cols, G Krebs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child psychiatry and human development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

L BlackerResearch Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, WC1E 7HB, London, UK.
M GuptaDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
R QuinnDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
B MonzaniNational and Specialist OCD, BDD and Related Disorders Clinic for Young People, South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8981-0285
A JassiNational and Specialist OCD, BDD and Related Disorders Clinic for Young People, South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1006-3008
D VealeDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1717-4766
D Mataix-ColsDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4545-0924
G KrebsResearch Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, WC1E 7HB, London, UK. g.krebs@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5353-5645

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) typically develops during adolescence, but there has been little research evaluating assessment tools for BDD in youth. This study sought to provide a comprehensive psychometric evaluation of a brief self-report questionnaire of BDD symptoms, the Body Image Questionnaire Child and Adolescent version (BIQ-C), in both clinical and non-clinical adolescent samples. Properties of the BIQ-C were examined in 479 adolescents recruited through schools and 118 young people with BDD attending a specialist clinic. Sensitivity to change was additionally examined in a subgroup of the clinical sample who received treatment (n = 35). Exploratory factor analysis indicated that a two-factor structure provided the best fit for the data in the non-clinical sample. The two-factor solution was corroborated through confirmatory factor analysis as the best solution in the clinical sample, although it did not fulfil predefined fit thresholds The first factor encompassed preoccupation and repetitive behaviours, while the second included items assessing functional impairment. The BIQ-C showed good internal consistency across both samples, and convergent validity with other measures of BDD. Among those in the clinical sample who received treatment, BIQ-C scores decreased significantly, and BIQ-C change scores were highly correlated with change scores on the gold-standard clinician-rated measure of BDD symptom severity. These findings indicate that the BIQ-C is a suitable tool for assessing BDD symptoms in young people and measuring change during treatment.

Indexed as

Body Dysmorphic DisordersBody ImagePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsAdolescentChildFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentsAssessmentBody dysmorphic disorderFactor analysisPsychometric

Identifiers

PMID39404939
PMCPMC13437764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.