ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025
Comparative analysis of classic and delayed Ménière's disease: clinical characteristics and endolymphatic hydrops manifestations in an Asian cohort.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the clinical characteristics and endolymphatic hydrops (ELH) Manifestations in patients with delayed Ménière's disease (DMD) compared to classic Ménière's disease (CMD).
methodsA prospective cohort study was conducted involving 523 patients diagnosed with MD. Clinical data, inner ear function, and ELH characteristics were analyzed and compared between CMD and DMD groups. Assessments included audiometry, VEMP, and MRI.
resultsDMD prevalence was 6.1%. Bilateral MD was significantly more common in DMD (34.4% vs. 14.5%, P = 0.003). DMD patients had more severe hearing loss in the first involved ear and more deteriorated VEMP in the contralateral ear (P < 0.05). ELH was present in 100% of affected ears, with a higher contralateral ELH proportion in DMD (34.4% vs. 15.0%, P = 0.005).
conclusionsDMD patients exhibit a higher prevalence of bilateral MD, more severe hearing loss, and greater contralateral ELH compared to CMD patients. Both subtypes share similar ELH characteristics, suggesting common underlying mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39404881What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.